Parker Pioneer Stocks Orchids & Onions Obituaries Calendar Weather Public Notices Archives Clip n' Save Coupons
Weather Magnet

Solar energy getting a second look

BY MICHAEL HAYS
Today's News-Herald
Published Thursday, January 25, 2007 10:04 PM MST

The sun's rays are always free, but concerns of high initial costs have kept some from going solar in the home or business.


Now, with UniSource announcing the possibility of future electric rate hikes, is the technology worth a serious look?

Kevin Michael of Lake Havasu City was so convinced of solar power's benefits that he had photovoltaic (PV) panels installed on his roof. Hooked up last September by local electrician AJL Solar, Michael anticipates it will take about ten years to pay off his investment. PV panels collect natural energy from the sun and convert it to usable energy without the use of fossil fuels.

“Significant savings” already have been realized on his bill, he explained. But it is hard to gauge the true benefit compared to last year because family members visited frequently during the holiday season this year and used a lot of energy, Michael said. Nevertheless, he has a more powerful motive for investing in alternative energy.

“The main reason is for the environment,” he said.

For a home in Lake Havasu City with a typical electric bill of $50 and a five-kilowatt direct current system, the pollution reduction is significant in switching to solar, according to Clean Power Research. Since burning coal generates most electricity, just that one home going solar can save an estimated annual release of 10,112 pounds of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

If money is the bottom line, UniSource Energy Services has started the ball rolling on electric rate hikes that would result in 4.4 percent increases for residential customers and 18.5 percent jumps for small businesses in Mohave County if approved. No hearing date has been scheduled yet.

For those able to absorb an initial investment in the thousands of dollars, solar looks better each year, according to one industry expert.

Matt Lamont, an architect with Moran Architects in Scottsdale, helps people and businesses that are trying to “go green.” He said the average initial investment for homeowners is $12,000. It takes most people seven to ten years to pay it off, said Lamont.

“Once it pays for itself, your paying a fraction of what you did before,” said Lamont on utility bill savings.

A wide array of financial incentives in Arizona is making the decision of turning to the sun that much easier. There are personal tax credits, personal deductions, a property tax exemption and several commercial breaks for businesses. Sales tax is exempt from most solar appliances, according to the Database for State Incentives and Renewable Energy.

As a resident of Alaska, Michael is applying for the federal $2,000 tax credit for solar photovoltaics. It expires at the end of 2007.

Lamont explained that the mass production of solar equipment - and constantly evolving technology - lower costs each year. Arizona is one of the states that allow customers to sell excess energy collected back to the utility company. This can lead to the blissful feeling of watching the household electric meter actually spin backwards.

Although Michael is not generating enough power to send any back to the grid, there is a spot on his bill for it should he eventually get to that point.

In November, the Arizona Corporation Commission approved new alternative energy requirements for electric utility companies like UniSource. By 2025, 15 percent of the total megawatts sold to customers must come from renewable sources, which include solar, wind, biomass, geothermal and other technologies. In 2006, the requirement was 1.25 percent, states the ACC.

To help utilities deal with costs associated with the higher standards, the maximum residential surcharge increased from $0.35 to $1.05 for customers using renewable sources, according to ACC.

Allan Lambor, owner of AJL Solar, has been doing solar installations for the past eleven years. Like many of his customers, he receives satisfaction knowing he is doing something to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil.

“We just can't keep projecting this type of energy without some form of help,” Lambor said.

On the Web at www.dsireusa.org and www.clean-power.com/nyserdaweb

You may contact the reporter at hays@havausnews.com

Article Rating

    Current Rating: 4 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Comments (4 comment(s))

    Jay Draiman wrote on Dec 16, 2007 4:49 PM:

    " Selling Renewable Energy (Solar Etc.) Without Incentives In short, we need to market solar as an investment that will save money while you own it and return most or all of your investment when you sell the building it's sitting on. Chances are, as natural gas and oil prices go up, there will be a corresponding jump in your monthly electricity bill. So, instead of promoting a solar power system based on today's savings in electricity, we need to have easily understandable projections on what the savings will be over the life of a system. These numbers need to reflect what's really happening to the cost of energy! Here are some ideas I'd like to share. First, we need to find a way to make renewable energy economically competitive without the tax incentives. We do this by answering the question: "What is the opportunity cost of not using solar to decrease your energy bill?" There's something interesting I've found. There's a direct correlation among electrical rates, the cost of air conditioning a building, the heat index and the amount of sunshine on any given day. In other words, on the hottest, sunniest days, we use more electricity that costs more per kilowatt. So, why do we continue to promote average hours of solar production, when in fact (at least down here in California), we produce far more solar power per day during the heat of the summer when energy costs are highest, than we do in our temperate winter months when energy costs are lowest. A sound marketing approach would be to evaluate solar energy in "dollars" of production per year instead of in kilowatts. I'm sure there are some smart people out there who can match kilowatts of solar production on any given day of the year to what the rates will be (based on the projected costs of electricity). Secondly, we should stop trying to sell a solar package as a "cost." In real estate, there is a principle that says anything affixed to real estate becomes an integral part of the real estate. Once a solar package is installed, it immediately increases the value of a property. So how can you predict how much more a building will be worth in 5-10 years with a package as opposed to without one? In the real estate appraisal business, there are three approaches to appraising a property. The market approach (what are comparable properties selling for), the reproduction cost (the cost of creating an identical building at current construction and material prices) and the actual original cost adjusted for inflation. In all three methods, there's a strong case that a system installed today will make the building worth more today and in future years. We need some realistic numbers to predict how much more a property will be worth in the years following installation. I believe that if you sell a building 5-10 years after installing solar, you should recoup all of your investment in the system plus an added bonus. If the rumors are true, a residential system (using the market approach) adds $20 of value to a home for every $1 it saves on the electric bill. For commercial appraisals, you would divide the income (savings) by a cap rate (which was about 9% at last report). A system that saves $2000 a year then would be worth $40,000 on a home or $25,000 on a business. But if the cost of electricity goes up (if that is remotely possible), then wouldn't the value of the solar power system increase as well? In reality, we are not selling something that costs — we are actually offering a financial investment that grows comparably with other forms of energy. In short, we need to market solar as an investment that will save money while you own it and return most or all of your investment when you sell the building it's sitting on. In commercial real estate, they use a "Cash Flow Analysis" form as the tool to evaluate a building's value using the income approach. We need a similar tool for putting a value on solar. If solar makes sense with this approach, then just think of how much better the systems look when you add the tax advantages! This approach also applies to the cost of Energy efficiency implementation. Reducing operational costs increases the value of the business and or property. Compiled by Jay Draiman, Energy analyst 12/1/2007 "

    Deven wrote on Jan 28, 2007 2:10 PM:

    " Too bad solar energy won't work very well in Alaska due to the weather being cloudy or rainy most of the time... "

    Jay Draiman wrote on Jan 28, 2007 9:17 AM:

    " MANDATORY RENEWABLE ENERGY – THE ENERGY EVOLUTION –R11 In order to insure energy and economic independence as well as better economic growth without being blackmailed by foreign countries, our country, the United States of America’s Utilization of Energy sources must change. "Energy drives our entire economy." We must protect it. "Let's face it, without energy the whole economy and economic society we have set up would come to a halt. So you want to have control over such an important resource that you need for your society and your economy." The American way of life is not negotiable. Our continued dependence on fossil fuels could and will lead to catastrophic consequences. The federal, state and local government should implement a mandatory renewable energy installation program for residential and commercial property on new construction and remodeling projects with the use of energy efficient material, mechanical systems, appliances, lighting, etc. The source of energy must by renewable energy such as Solar-Photovoltaic, Geothermal, Wind, Biofuels, Ocean-Tidal, etc. including utilizing water from lakes, rivers and oceans to circulate in cooling towers to produce air conditioning and the utilization of proper landscaping to reduce energy consumption. (Sales tax on renewable energy products should be reduced or eliminated) The implementation of mandatory renewable energy could be done on a gradual scale over the next 10 years. At the end of the 10 year period all construction and energy use in the structures throughout the United States must be 100% powered by renewable energy. (This can be done by amending building code) In addition, the governments must impose laws, rules and regulations whereby the utility companies must comply with a fair “NET METERING” (the buying of excess generation from the consumer at market price), including the promotion of research and production of “renewable energy technology” with various long term incentives and grants. The various foundations in existence should be used to contribute to this cause. A mandatory time table should also be established for the automobile industry to gradually produce an automobile powered by renewable energy. The American automobile industry is surely capable of accomplishing this task. As an inducement to buy hybrid automobiles (sales tax should be reduced or eliminated on American manufactured automobiles). This is a way to expedite our energy independence and economic growth. (This will also create a substantial amount of new jobs). It will take maximum effort and a relentless pursuit of the private, commercial and industrial government sectors commitment to renewable energy – energy generation (wind, solar, hydro, biofuels, geothermal, energy storage (fuel cells, advance batteries), energy infrastructure (management, transmission) and energy efficiency (lighting, sensors, automation, conservation) (rainwater harvesting, water conservation) (energy and natural resources conservation) in order to achieve our energy independence. "To succeed, you have to believe in something with such a passion that it becomes a reality." Jay Draiman, Energy Consultant Northridge, CA. 91325 Jan. 28, 2007 P.S. I have a very deep belief in America's capabilities. Within the next 10 years we can accomplish our energy independence, if we as a nation truly set our goals to accomplish this. I happen to believe that we can do it. In another crisis--the one in 1942--President Franklin D. Roosevelt said this country would build 60,000 [50,000] military aircraft. By 1943, production in that program had reached 125,000 aircraft annually. They did it then. We can do it now. The American people resilience and determination to retain the way of life is unconquerable and we as a nation will succeed in this endeavor of Energy Independence. Solar energy is the source of all energy on the earth (excepting volcanic geothermal). Wind, wave and fossil fuels all get their energy from the sun. Fossil fuels are only a battery which will eventually run out. The sooner we can exploit all forms of Solar energy (cost effectively or not against dubiously cheap FFs) the better off we will all be. If the battery runs out first, the survivors will all be living like in the 18th century again. Every new home built should come with a solar package. A 1.5 kW per bedroom is a good rule of thumb. The formula 1.5 X's 5 hrs per day X's 30 days will produce about 225 kWh per bedroom monthly. This peak production period will offset 17 to 2 4 cents per kWh with a potential of $160 per month or about $60,000 over the 30-year mortgage period for a three-bedroom home. It is economically feasible at the current energy price and the interest portion of the loan is deductible. Why not? Title 24 has been mandated forcing developers to build energy efficient homes. Their bull-headedness put them in that position and now they see that Title 24 works with little added cost. Solar should also be mandated and if the developer designs a home that solar is impossible to do then they should pay an equivalent mitigation fee allowing others to put solar on in place of their negligence. (Installation should be paid “performance based”) Installation of renewable energy and its performance should be paid to the installer and manufacturer based on "performance based" (that means they are held accountable for the performance of the product - that includes the automobile industry). This will gain the trust and confidence of the end-user to proceed with such a project; it will also prove to the public that it is a viable avenue of energy conservation. Installing renewable energy system on your home or business increases the value of the property and provides a marketing advantage. Nations of the world should unite and join together in a cohesive effort to develop and implement MANDATORY RENEWABLE ENERGY for the sake of humankind and future generations. Jay Draiman Northridge, CA 91325 Email: renewableenergy2@msn.com "

    Mr.Flanman wrote on Jan 26, 2007 2:38 PM:

    " How much are panels??? "

WRITE A COMMENT

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone and we reserve the right to withhold or remove any comment from publication.

Do not post:
    * Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
    * Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
    * Personal attacks, insults or threats.
    * The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
    * Comments unrelated to the story.


Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in havasunews.com's story comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of Today's News Herald. Today's News Herald provides an interactive computer service and does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Today's News Herald spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
 
e-Edition

VIDEOS

American Profile

e-Edition

e-Edition

Special Sections








View All Special Sections

Readers' Poll

Calendar

Stocks