Parker Pioneer Stocks Orchids & Onions Obituaries Calendar Weather Public Notices Archives Clip n' Save Coupons
Weather Magnet

Area educators oppose guns in schools

STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS
Today's News-Herald
Published Monday, February 18, 2008 10:49 PM MST

A community college official predicted Monday there will be protracted battle if the Arizona Legislature proceeds with a proposal to allow people with concealed weapons permits to carry guns at K-12 schools, community colleges and universities.


“Since the shootings on different campuses, people have brought that up, but I think it’s a reaction to isolated incidents and isolated crimes, and I don’t think it’s the best way to handle it,” Mohave Community College Chancellor Michael Kerns said. “I image before something like this would move forward, this would end up with a lot of debate or winding up in the courts.”

The head of the Lake Havasu Unified School district was also skeptical about the proposal.

“It surprises me, because the only people I would ever want on a school campus with guns is law enforcement,” Superintendent Gail Malay said. “I can’t think of any reason why anyone should come onto a school campus with a concealed weapon.”

Malay said she understood people’s concerns about school shootings, but she doesn’t “want to see a war start in a school zone if someone starts shooting and someone else is shooting back.”

The Senate Judiciary Committee is weighing arguments made Monday over the proposal. The committee listened to more than two hours of testimony about the proposal, but didn’t take a vote. The testimony came four days after a gunman opened fire during a lecture at Northern Illinois University, killing five young people before turning a gun on himself.

“We had 73 people log in to speak, which was the longest list I’ve every seen,” said Sen. Ron Gould, R-Lake Havasu City, vice chairman of the Judiciary Committee.

The majority of those who commented were school and law enforcement officials and gun advocates, Gould said. He said opinions were split, with school officials and law enforcement opposing the bill and gun advocates favoring it.

Gould said changes are being made to the bill and he’s “reserving judgment” about how to vote on it until he sees the revised version.

Supporters of the proposal said people with permits to carry concealed weapons should be allowed to carry guns at schools so they can defend themselves and others if a gunman starts shooting people and police haven’t yet arrived at the scene.

Republican state Sen. Karen Johnson of Mesa, author of the proposal, said teachers and college students have contacted her to voice support for the bill because they don’t want to be left unprotected.

“The police can’t always be there. Unfortunately, when you have an incident on a campus, it’s always after the fact that the police get there,” Johnson said, pointing out that it took police 90 seconds to respond to the scene in Illinois.

Opponents said police officers urgently responding to a school shooting might have difficulty distinguishing innocent permit-holders from the gunman.

“If we are delayed in our rapid deployment, I fear that additional lives will be lost because we will have to take the time to identify each and every gun that we encounter while we attempt to locate the source of the shots,” said Greg Fowler, police chief at Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff and an opponent of the bill.

Thirteen states have considered similar proposals this year that would open the door for some gun owners to bring weapons to schools. Three dozens states prohibit people from carrying at schools, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Arizona law now forbids people from carrying weapons on school grounds, except unloaded firearms kept in vehicles controlled by adults, guns not visible from outside locked cars and guns used in school-approved programs.

Under Arizona law, weapons are allowed at schools for hunter- and firearms-safety courses, and police officers are already exempt from the prohibition against carrying guns at schools.

Anthony Daykin, police chief at the University of Arizona, where a nursing student fatally shot three professors and killed himself in 2002, said the proposal could cause confusion because permit-holders might mistake other law-abiding gun-carriers for an accomplice in a school shooting.

“What kind of carnage might we have while some of them deal with the initial threat and then others deal with the secondary threat that they believe exists?” Daykin asked.

Supporters cited a 1997 school shooting in Pearl, Miss., where a teacher retrieved a gun from his car when a student opened fire, then held the student at bay until police arrived.

Rick Dalton, a school teacher and retired Mesa police officer, said horrific school shootings can be prevented by permit-holders.

“Guns in the hands of bad people do bad things,” said Dalton, a supporter of the bill. “But guns in the hands of good people do good things.”

Article Rating

    Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Comments (24 comment(s))

    Man with no Rights wrote on Feb 24, 2008 2:39 PM:

    " Why do I have no Rights to protect my own children with my own gun at the school? One more reason for private schools and homeschooling our children! "

    Be real wrote on Feb 23, 2008 9:10 PM:

    " So people who have guns may not be smart enough to know when to use them and when not? Is that not true in any other circumstance? How many children are born to parents who abuse/kill them? You don't even apply to get a license for that. DUI drivers killing innocent people? All cars should have breathalizers then....

    Our world is changing and we better make some changes or else reap the consequences. Whatever we are doing now isn't working..... "

    Common Sense wrote on Feb 23, 2008 8:40 PM:

    " it's pretty obvious.... there HAS been shootings at: schools, banks, post offices, mc donalds, liquor stores, malls, churchs, funerals, weddings, birthday parties, cemetaries, hospitals, courtrooms, freeways, just about ANYPLACE you can think of. I can think of ONLY ONE place there has NEVER been a shooting.... A GUN SHOW !!!!! "

    tom wrote on Feb 23, 2008 9:21 AM:

    " Laws that keep guns out of schools only keep law abiding citizens from protecting themselves.
    They do not, and never will, keep killers from bringing guns to school and shooting people. If someone wants to shoot up their school, they will do it whether the law says they can bring the gun or not, obviously.

    The "good" people, who don't want to break the law leave their guns at home, allowing schools to be slaughter houses. It's the same thing with places like malls.

    whoever said law enforcement are the only ones who can determine who the bad guy really is? If the guy shooting at me and other students, I can probably deduce that he is the bad guy. And people should have a right to defend themselves from the bad guy in that situation. "

    Killing fields wrote on Feb 22, 2008 11:47 AM:

    " police cannot protect kids in school. They get there after deaths have happened to write reports and tell us what a shame it is.
    Those who said they don't want want schools to be war zones would rather they be slaughter houses? "

    Fairman wrote on Feb 22, 2008 10:32 AM:

    " Why the Police Officer can escort his kids with his gun on his side? Life is not fair! "

    thatguy wrote on Feb 22, 2008 10:27 AM:

    " I don't think that people are thinking about this the right way so let me try to change the perspective. Allowing teachers and security guards to carry concealed weapons at school would help the situation because it would be a deterrent. It's not going to stop the crazy people who want to kill others then kill themselves; but who it can help is the people they are trying to kill.
    Let's say I'm a crazy and think about going into a school and killing people randomly. I'm going to think twice if I know that someone else is armed, or potentially many people are armed.
    Also I agree it might be a person who doesn't care and is going to do it anyway but instead of that person killing 6 people. Maybe they only kill one before someone shoots them. Isn't this better than the former? "

    james wrote on Feb 21, 2008 5:26 PM:

    " I have had a busines 30 years sold and retired but got bored so became an armed security guard. Oh yes got bored again and work as sub at school now for 2 years. Let me tell you there is NO security at any of the schools as I have walked around most of the schools and NOONE had stopped to question me. Had a principal enter my room and at that time did not know who he was until after he left and asked the students who he was. He should have stated who he was. Not too smart. I probably will not sub anymore as students run the school not the adm. Now about guns. Yes would be in favor of carrying a gun concealed. That would be for my protection and the students. I could go on and on "

    Nameless wrote on Feb 21, 2008 4:48 PM:

    " Do any of you people know why these killers pick schools to shoot up?? You don't see them walking into NRA meetings trying that crap, do ya?? Do you ever hear about them running into gun ranges shooting at people?? Do you hear them running into police stations shooting at people?? NO. They go to schools because we have all these people out there who say a school should be a GUN FREE zone, but guess what, THAT ONLY STOPS THE GOOD CITIZENS FROM CARRYING GUNS ON CAMPUS. The killers don't care if it's a gun free zone. Taking away the right to carry a gun makes good people victims and it makes it easier for bad people to do what they want. I guarentee if we didn't have all of these "gun free" zones, these CRIMINALS would think twice about running into them shooting people at random. They would be worried about someone on campus carrying a weapon and shooting back. Good thing they don't have to worry about that since all of the good people who obey the law left their guns at home and are now VICTIMS. Yes, I do believe schools should NEVER EVER have a gun on campus, but it is painfully obvious that's not stopping CRIMINALS from shooting people in schools. In a perfect world it would be acceptable to make a school zone a gun free area, but this is FAR from a perfect world. Open your eyes and think about this. These laws only prevent the INNOCENT VICTIMS from protecting themselves. My children will never step foot onto one of these properties, nor will I ever again. Good luck with your gun free zones. "

    Nameless wrote on Feb 21, 2008 6:46 AM:

    " Evelyn, what good is a metal detector going to do if I want to go into a school and shoot people??? Are you being serious with that moronic statement? If I'm not worried about the consequences of killing several innocent people, why would I be worried about a beeping noise as I enter the school?? Or the UNARMED guy who sits at the metal detector. HE IS UNARMED. He will be the first to get shot and killed thanks to you. It's funny how I hear these people say "There is no reason to have guns in schools." WHAT??!?!?!?!? HELLO!?!?!?!?!? Do you read the news?!?!?!?!? We have crazy people running into schools shooting innocent people on a pretty regualr basis. THAT'S NOT A GOOD ENOUGH REASON TO LET THESE PEOPLE PROTECT THEMSELVES!??!?!?! Wait until it happens to you.

    Malay said she understood people’s concerns about school shootings, but she doesn’t “want to see a war start in a school zone if someone starts shooting and someone else is shooting back.”

    I can't believe this woman has the brain power to walk and talk after reading that. She doesn't want someone to shoot back at the KILLER because it will look like a war......as opposed to what?!?!?!? The KILLER picking off his targets without a care in the world since he knows nobody is armed??!?!?!? Yeah, I'd much rather expose the kids to a situation where they are just sitting ducks waiting to get executed than TRY TP PROTECT THEM! HELLO!?!?!?!?! "

    Evelyn wrote on Feb 20, 2008 9:56 PM:

    " There is no need to have guns in school. If people are so concerned then we can get metal detectors. People on school grounds should never have a gun. I know we have seen all over the U.S people getting shot up, but theres no need to add to the problem. Dont get me wrong im not a girl that thinks guns are bad, so dont even go there. I just dont think everyone that has a gun is smart enough to have one, even if they have a concealed weapons permit. "

    April wrote on Feb 20, 2008 1:45 PM:

    " First of all, i'm sure they are not referring to students carrying guns but school officials. Second, anyone who has gone through the Concealed Weapons course or any "normal" person will know to drop their gun when the police arrive and not keep shooting. I think that if just one life can be saved then do what needs to be done. And remember, where there is a will, there is a way. If someone plans on doing harm to others, they will do it whether there is a law or not. "

    Or...... wrote on Feb 20, 2008 11:50 AM:

    " What is needed is a gun equivilant to the 'good samaritan" act. If you have a legally concealed weapon and use it to defend someones life using reasonable force you (and the school) should be protected from lawsuits.

    Or, why not have the teachers kill the shooter with a Taser. 280 deaths by taser so far, or at least aim for the shooters chest and give his groin a jolt as happened in Havasu last year. "

    RIVR wrote on Feb 20, 2008 11:41 AM:

    " WHY WOULD YOU EVEN THINK ABOUT CARRING A GUN TO SCHOOL,I CANT BELIEVE WERE EVEN HAVING THIS DISCUSSION,I DONT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH GUNS BUT NOT AT SCHOOL. "

    Asolution wrote on Feb 20, 2008 10:51 AM:

    " Lets ask these questions:

    1. Do teachers have the right to defend their students and themselves in the event of a school shooting?

    2. Does the school itself have an obligation to do all it can within reasonable limites to protect the students they are charged with?

    3. Do the parents and students have a right to be safe on school grounds during the school day?

    You can answer these questions in a variety of ways. Schools were NEVER designed to be safe from someone coming on campus and opening up with gun-fire. Schools MUST react to a situation they can't be proactive, NO ONE can. Police arriving within 90 seconds is amazing! Still it is not enough. Will guns on campus make it any safer? Or is this a situation we must accept can happen and we deal with it the best we can? Is this the best we can do? "

    I.Carry wrote on Feb 20, 2008 7:00 AM:

    " When it comes down to it, the regulations and training regarding issuance of a CCW here in Arizona are not rigorous enough for me to get behind the idea of classroom teachers carrying on campus. I have my CCW permit, I have also worked as a police officer in the military, and I am a combat veteran. I go to the range at least once a week and stay on top of my training. How many permit holders can say that? Would I carry in the classroom, probably… Should every teacher? Not without further training. As an educator, students are your responsibility. If that educator is carrying and a situation arises, they need the training and proficiency to react in the same manner and to the same rigor as a police officer. Teachers should get that type of training as it is, and they should absolutely go through annual training if they are going to be allowed to carry on campus. "

    Kathleen wrote on Feb 20, 2008 3:08 AM:

    " A few years ago, I went to visit someone I worked with, whose apt. had a front door which was half-glass. I asked her wasn't she afraid with that glass door. She said 'no, I'm a light sleeper'. To make a long story short, I made her take one of my guns- about a month later, in the middle of the night, she is awakened by the sound of glass breaking; she is so terrified, she can't move. She doesn't know what to do and feels she will have a heartattack, her chest is so heavy, she couldn't even swallow . As she is listening to the noises of the intruder coming in, she suddenly remembers 'I've got a gun'. She snatched the gun out of her nightstand, and in the dark went into that livingroom. The man was aleady in; all he needed to hear was her cocking that gun; he stopped abruptly, backed up, apologizung profusely, as he is backing toward the front door, with the usual 'excuse me, pardon me, I've got the wrong house'. And wouldn't you know, the next day at work as she is crying and hugging me and thanking me, 5 of the women she works with, still thought it was terrible I had given her a gun. Sometimes, there is just no acounting for logic... Kathleen "

    Mark in Havasu wrote on Feb 19, 2008 7:28 PM:

    " At least Arizona has enough intestinal fortitude to do something about the ineffectiveness and resultant inherent danger of "gun-free" zones which have been imposed in the name of "protection"--kinda like a restraining order, you know? Call the cops, they will get there in time to take a homicide report.
    It's better to be a sheepdog than a bleating sheep.......at least the sheepdog will protect the flock. "

    Roughman wrote on Feb 19, 2008 4:15 PM:

    " Qoute from article: "Malay said she understood people’s concerns about school shootings, but she doesn’t 'want to see a war start in a school zone if someone starts shooting and someone else is shooting back.'"

    So, would she rather see deranged, armed, killers just mow down innocent victims because there are no armed, honest citizens present?

    Making "Safe Zones" for criminals just doesn't seem to make much sense to me... "

    fred t. wrote on Feb 19, 2008 10:58 AM:

    " I can understand why any official would have to say they oppose any guns on any campus. After any shooting at all, they'd get sued by all the suehappy lawyers for being supportive of the concept. I have to hope, however, that in the back of their own minds, though, they have a much better grasp of reality. I was discussing this with a high school student shortly after the Columbine tragedy. She didn't like guns at all. I asked her if she'd rather have someone like me (armed, trained, sober, cautious, and willing to defend her and others - and most likely carrying a weapon but you'd NEVER know it because it's CONCEALED) sitting next to her, or some pacifist who would duck and cover at the first threat. She sheepishly had to admit her argument, like most liberals' arguments, was based on the emotion of how we WANT the world to be, not the logical way the world ACTUALLY IS. "

    George Morris wrote on Feb 19, 2008 9:13 AM:

    " I wonder how the people that don't want
    guns on campus would feel if someone was shooting at them and the guy beside them says "I've got a permit to carry lots of places but you stopped me from carring here on campus so instead of me being able to stop him you and I will die," "

    Jim wrote on Feb 19, 2008 7:28 AM:

    " Just like a liberal school official to recognize a "war" when she sees it... I cannot disagree more - And I understand how legal advisors instruct our officials to not be in favor of these things regardless of common sense. How horrible it would be to see someone shooting back!?!?!?!WOW!!! So, let me see if this adds up... some whackjob shows up with multiple guns and hundreds of rounds of ammo (each round with the potential to kill - that means hundreds of innocents killed, Ms. Malay) and oops, someONE (with no criminal record or mental institutional time and government approved training under his/her belt, BTW) decides to shoot back, perhaps stopping, but most likely slowing the progress of the attack...until police arrive. Yeah, maybe they shoot at each other, but maybe A WHOLE LOT LESS KIDS DIE!!!!!!! You, Ma'am, truly understand how the government works. When seconds count, the police are minutes away!!! You should at least heed your own words... "It's for the kids," So I'll ask you in the similar condesending tone you like to use... If only one child could be saved, wouldn't it be worth it???? "

    Iowa Resident wrote on Feb 19, 2008 4:38 AM:

    " It is absurb to think that guns should be allowed at any institution of learning. If you approve carrying a concealed weapon at a college, what makes you think they won't be snuck in at the high school level, or middle school level, or heaven forbid the elementary school level. It is just plain stupid to allow guns to be carried by anyone except for law enforcement officials. They are the only ones capable of determining exactly who the bad guy is., After all they do have the training.
    My vote if anyone is interested, is to "not allow guns to be carried in and educational enviroment." "

    Whaz Up! wrote on Feb 18, 2008 11:32 PM:

    " I would like to know how many teachers and students have contacted Senator Johnson requesting the change in the law. That it took 90 Seconds for Police to arrive at the School Shooting in Illinois..as a primary reason to change the law is plain stupid. This is not the 1800's...Whaz Up with that! "

WRITE A COMMENT

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone and we reserve the right to withhold or remove any comment from publication.

Do not post:
    * Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
    * Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
    * Personal attacks, insults or threats.
    * The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
    * Comments unrelated to the story.


Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in havasunews.com's story comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of Today's News Herald. Today's News Herald provides an interactive computer service and does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Today's News Herald spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
 
e-Edition

VIDEOS

American Profile

e-Edition

e-Edition

Special Sections








View All Special Sections

Readers' Poll

Calendar

Stocks