Weather Magnet
Subscribe
from archives: News
Printable Version | | Comment (17 comment(s)) | Rate | Text Size
Building impact fees just day away


Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:40 PM MST

With date for implementation of impact fees on construction just a day away, contractors in Lake Havasu City still have many questions as to how the fees will affect new construction in the city.

Since the Lake Havasu City Council passed the ordinance in late April, very little building has been done in the city, according to Bud Schulz, executive director of the Colorado River Building Industry Association in Lake Havasu City.

“My concern is any type of additional fees to construction costs is only going to hurt the city,” contractor Tom Askland of Askland & Associates, Inc., said. “We are at the bottom of a real estate depression.”

The leeway time between the passing of the ordinance and its implementation was supposed to help increase the number of building permits pulled. Schulz, himself, had predicted a rush of permits being handed out before the Aug. 1 deadline. This just did not happen.

According to Schulz, only three building permits were handed out for single-family homes in the month of June. The 2005 number of permits for single-family homes averaged about 75 per month, he said. As of July 1, only 104 permits for single-family homes have been issued for 2008, according to the city Development Services Department.

The decline in new home construction can be linked to the large number and plummeting prices of existing homes on the market. In June, the Lake Havasu Association of Realtors listed the number of total active listings at 2,732 homes, with 873 vacant land lots included. And 1,479 of the listings were residential.

The average selling price of the residential homes was down to $267,189, almost $60,000 from the June 2007 average price of $325,655.

In addition to the glut of existing homes on the market, the newly created impact fee will further hinder new home construction, some builders contend.

The cap for impact fees on new construction of a single-family residential home is $6,000. The city council worked to reduce that amount. The fee for a single-family home for 2008 would be $2,213, with multi-family homes incurring a fee of $2,145. These figures will gradually go up 25 percent each of the next two years. A single-family home would have a fee of $4,423 in 2010.

Meanwhile, Workforce Arizona recorded a loss of 700 construction jobs in Kingman and Lake Havasu City for the month of June. Construction jobs have declined in both cities for 10 straight months. Schulz said construction workers have to look elsewhere for work, which could cause many families to leave the city, further damaging the real estate market in the city.

If construction is down and permits and jobs are scarce, Askland asks what impact fees can be applied, if there is no construction?

“If nobody builds, they won’t get funding from impact fees or permits,” Askland said. “Right now we are at the bottom of the trough, and these fees will not help get us out.”

The impact fees apply to new construction and building on to existing properties. Essentially, if the number of square feet changes for non-residential retail businesses, an additional $1.35 per square foot will be applied. Impact fees for general commercial business will cost $1.57 per square foot.

These numbers are only 50 percent of the total fees and only apply to the 2008 calendar year.

Impact fees will go up to 75 percent in 2009 and 100 percent in 2010.

Impact fees normally are implemented immediately at 100 percent.

Contractors like Marcella Lehr and Mark Durand said they felt the fees were unavoidable. However, they both believe implementing them now will only further damage an industry sitting on its last leg.

“The impact fees are necessary, but the timing is not,” Lehr said.

Mayor Mark Nexsen defended the council’s decision to implement the fees now, saying with the current real estate crisis nationwide, the impact of the fees would be less detrimental, because business was already down.

“There is never a good time for impact fees,” Nexsen said, “but, this is an honest fee at the best time. I take no pleasure in impact fees, but it is absolutely necessary for the benefit of the community.”

The impact fees will not affect any permits issued before Aug. 1, Nexsen said. They also will not apply to any construction begun before the Aug. 1 date.

Nexsen said if construction in the community were scarce, the city simply would not be able to build structures long in the works such as the new fire station.

The 2008 breakdown of the Aug. 1 implementation for a single-family home is $615 for police, $433 for fire, $820 for parks, $115 for general government and $230 for transportation per home.

The Aug. 1 breakdown for 2008 per square foot for retail business construction is $0.43 for police, $0.31 for fire, $.08 for general government and $0.53 for transportation.

The figures for commercial construction are identical to retail with exception of a slight increase in fees for transportation at $0.75 per square foot.

It is the local contractors who will most be affected by the implementation of the impact fees. Many cities in California and Arizona including Kingman, Bullhead City and Flagstaff have impact fees in place. Contractors from outside Lake Havasu City would therefore be used to paying such fees. The question now is will new outside contractors decide to build in the city?

Schulz said one way things could turn around would be to bring corporate restaurants such as Red Lobster or The Olive Garden in. He pointed to the recent addition of the Wal-Mart Supercenter on State Route 95 as an example. Businesses such as these could possibly increase employment opportunities and increase the city revenue from the impact fees. Companies like this could afford to pay the impact fees for construction.

Local contractors are building in the community. Schulz pointed to the recent construction of Foothill Estates as an example.

Still, some contractors and builders are hoping the city might delay the implementation of the fees. In a last minute effort to be heard, Lehr, Durand and several other contractors met with Lake Havasu City Developmental Services Director Larry Didion on Monday. Didion could not be reached for comment.

As of Wednesday, Nexsen said no motion had been presented to him for the council to consider. The council would have to call a special meeting and give 24 hours notice beforehand.

Schulz said after fighting the implementation of the fees since October 2007, there is no more that can be done.

“In respect to the impact fees, the issue is a done deal,” he said. “The city council has made their decision.”


Article Rating
Current Rating: 2 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Reader Comments
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of havasunews.com.

Reader Comments

For Sale wrote on Aug 7, 2008 3:15 PM:

" to fair share.. What condo project? You did not see the for sale sign? 'someone else' has to pay the impact fee... that is a remodellimg anyway.. "

Taxman wrote on Aug 7, 2008 11:34 AM:

" The solution is easy. Do not build a new hause to an empty lot, get an old house and 'remodel it'. You can demolish the house, you just have part of the old fundation..No high impact fees and minimal tax increase. "

fair share wrote on Aug 7, 2008 10:27 AM:

" after reading this article i would hope that tom flatley will pay his fair share when he delelops the condo complex at the london bridge. this is a very large project and will have a major impact on city services. "

Fed Up wrote on Aug 6, 2008 1:13 PM:

" Well when you figure San Diegoi Salaries are at least 1/3 higher than anything in Havasu, it actually is more affordable. San Diego County Cops start at about $60,000 a year before the Academy compared to Havasus $40,000. "

USA lost wrote on Aug 6, 2008 12:50 PM:

" We the people should be outraged! A fire station at McCulloch and Sloop that was in the process of being built was halted because of lack of funds! How is it that we can come up with 200k for a dog park! Our property insurance rates are determined by the level of fire protection and fire department response times. The city leaders have lost sight of what the priorities are and what should be funded first! They want to raise our taxes too! By the way we only have six fire stations! Number seven was cancelled. We almost closed station six, staffing levels were cut to keep that station open. Lets build that dog park! "

USA lost wrote on Aug 6, 2008 11:44 AM:

" With revenue shrinking the govt. has to come up with new ways to separate the people from their money. The simple fact is the wages of the workers of this country are not keeping up with costs of goods and services. At a time of record corparate profits and executive perks, benefits and salaries what do you expect. Americans dont run this country anymore! The fat cats aren't going to allow what was our wealth and is now theirs to go to stuff like needed infrastructure. "

Desertrat wrote on Aug 3, 2008 3:10 PM:

" sandiego- And your city is cheap to live in? yeah right "

Whatever wrote on Aug 3, 2008 7:53 AM:

" sandiego- good idea stay way "

chance wrote on Jul 31, 2008 10:27 PM:

" keep thinking about the young people buying a house these days whether it be here or somewhere else ... they just don't have a chance at previous prices and the more the prices go down the better chance they have. "

Peter Proud wrote on Jul 31, 2008 8:00 PM:

" Are impact fees the same as property taxes?

The median price of an American home is 219,000. The median price of a Californian home is 518,000. Thank your new local residents for the surge of home values. Lake Havasu is in a desert! Home prices should currently be below American median homes price for that reason alone!

"A market place is a place set apart for men to deceive and get the better of one another". Anarchariss. 3rd cent A.D.

"Property is organized ROBBERY" George Bernard Shaw, 1907.

The trouble with the profit system has always been that it was highly unprofitable to most people".E. B. White, 1944

"Fee's are taxes" Peter Proud, 2008 "

As a Home Owner ... wrote on Jul 31, 2008 5:05 PM:

" Even as a home owner I like seeing the prices deflate.

I keep thinking about the young people buying a house these days whether it be here or somewhere else ... they just don't have a chance at previous prices and the more the prices go down the better chance they have.

I will gladly take a profit hit rather than see future generations have no chance at the opportunities I've had.

And for those wanting to sell there's still a benefit. By selling low and buying low a buyer and seller still comes out ahead.

Simple economics. "

sandiego wrote on Jul 31, 2008 3:05 PM:

" Boy you people must love high taxes and fees. I think I will let my lot sit for a while longer. "

waaaa wrote on Jul 31, 2008 12:05 PM:

" The housing prices are in line to what they should be. They were overinflated several years ago! "

A Waste wrote on Jul 31, 2008 11:28 AM:

" The city council seems to have imposed another tax based upon the recommendations of an outside firm. I understand the city needs to boost revenue to build new services, but what do we really need built in Havasu.

My question is where is this money going? When I asked this the response was to build necessary new infrastructure. No money is to go to hiring people or maintaining existing infrastructure. It all has to go to new structures and equipment to fill those structures.

I asked what this money was going to buy us; I was told we need a new police station and three new fire stations as well as other structures. Why do we need these? To maintain response times was the answer.

I have heard that Lake Havasu is 90% built out. When one police station services 90%, why do we need another one for the not yet built 10%. We have 7 fire stations, why do we need 3 more for such little growth. We need to keep in mind that the majority available land exists within current acceptable response times.

This brings us to the new development in new areas. The Foothills and the Island are the main culprits. Should the mass of the town shoulder infrastructure to keep the response time down in those areas? NO! Those areas should be charged for their necessary infrastructure.

I have nothing against building what is necessary to run our town. However, if the city would like to build infrastructure to expand so it can grow and generate new revenue, let’s call it that and discuss that as a separate issue. We do not need to build these new buildings, and we do not need to pay for them. "

WHAT wrote on Jul 31, 2008 7:43 AM:

" $820 for PARKS? OH my god. Our government officials are losing their minds and their perspective. Why is the amount higher for something hardly anyone uses as opposed to something which we all NEED and DEMAND (Fire, police). This is the most absurd thing that I have read in years!!! "

Spending like children wrote on Jul 31, 2008 4:54 AM:

" Impact fee are another word for tax, Havasu would be better off cutting the local government size and quit wasting money. If you want to see growth in Havasu put money into the hands of employees, get the wages up to the norm. You are about ten years behind. We don’t need you, cancer can be cut out you know. "

impact wrote on Jul 30, 2008 11:24 PM:

" The fees stink but the saving grace is Havasu's impact fees are less than people will pay in other locations, so it's not like people will choose a location other than Havasu just because of impact fees. Impact fees for single family homes average over $10,000, here's a link with more info:

http://www.housingzone.com/probuilder/article/CA6527434.html "

Post A Comment

You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
 

Comment Rules

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone and we reserve the right to withhold or remove any comment from publication.

Do not post:
    * Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
    * Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
    * Personal attacks, insults or threats.
    * The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
    * Comments unrelated to the story.


Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in havasunews.com's story comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of Today's News Herald. Today's News Herald provides an interactive computer service and does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Today's News Herald spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!


Stocks