Parker Pioneer Stocks Orchids & Onions Obituaries Calendar Weather Public Notices Archives Clip n' Save Coupons
Weather Magnet

Council agrees to Meehan settlement

By TONY WAGGONER
Today's News-Herald
Published Tuesday, July 28, 2009 10:55 PM MST

It wasn’t a decision they treaded lightly or one the Lake Havasu City Council might have wanted to make, but Tuesday the council agreed to a lawsuit settlement with the Meehan family.


The dilemma was agree to the settlement or face losing insurance coverage for defense of the case in appellate court, which could end up costing the taxpayers of Lake Havasu City.

The council ultimately decided for a settlement of $250,000 to be awarded to Ryan, Thomas and Caren Meehan, a decision that Councilman Dean Barlow said was still extortion, but there was no way the city could get out of it.

Mayor Mark Nexsen and Councilman Don Callahan both said the decision was not based upon the lawsuit agreement, but upon how defending the case in appellate court could cost taxpayers money.

“If something went wrong, what will the next jury decide,” Nexsen said. “What we are dealing with is subjecting taxpayers to an unknown bill.”

Under the terms of the city’s policy with Royal Insurance Company, the insurance carrier for the city at the time of the accident, the city is required to sign any release of settlement the insurance company approves, City Attorney Paul Lenkowsky.

While the city’s policy allowed the insurance carrier to come to a settlement agreement with a plaintiff, only the City Council could sign a release of the settlement agreement, Lenkowsky said. The amount of the settlement and decision to settle were the determination of the city’s attorney in the case, Bill King, and the insurance company, he said.

Refusing to sign the release could lead to the city losing its insurance coverage in the case, since it would be considered in violation of the terms of the policy.

“It is my understanding of the policy provisions that the (insurance) company would take the position or is likely to take the position that since the city has an affirmative duty to cooperate in facilitating the settlement of a claim, that duty would extend to approving the release portion of the agreement,” Lenkowsky told the council. “Since the release is an integral part of the settlement, there would be no settlement, and, therefore, a withholding consent of the release the city would in effect be obstructing settlement and could be in violation of the policy.”

The settlement and lawsuit that preceded it came in response to a 2002 automobile accident involving Ryan Meehan. Meehan was seriously injured after losing control of his vehicle and being thrown from the vehicle during a high-speed chase with a Lake Havasu City police officer. Meehan was not wearing his seatbelt at the time of the accident.

At the time of the accident, Meehan was intoxicated. The chase reached speeds of up to 70 miles per hour, after the officer attempted to pull Ryan Meehan over.

At the lawsuit trial, the city was found 18 percent liable for the accident and Meehan 82 percent.

Ryan Meehan was awarded zero damages. His parents, Thomas and Caren, were each awarded $12,150 for their loss of consortium claims.

Without the council signing the release, Lenkowsky said the city could be looking at even further costs to defend the case in court.

“If, as an abstract possibility, there were to be $500,000 verdict on a retrial, the city would be out-of-pocket the difference between the settlement amount and the actual verdict,” Lenkowsky said. “Equally important if the insurance company takes the position that due to non-cooperation there is no further liability under the policy, as they tendered an amount the plaintiff was willing to accept, they would also take the position logically if there is no further liability under the policy that they don’t have to pay legal counsel or pay any court costs in the continued defense of the case.”

The current settlement does not cost the city anything. It has reached its insurance deductible for the case. The settlement also states the city assumes no liability for the accident, but, as Councilman Lee Barnes put it Tuesday, that might not be how the public sees it.

“I think we would be foolish not to approve this,” Barnes said. “The problem I have is it makes us look like we were liable. I just want everybody to understand that really I don’t think we were liable for anything. When you give somebody a quarter of million dollars, a whole lot of people read it that you were guilty.”

You may contact the reporter at twaggoner@havasunews.com.

Article Rating

    Current Rating: 3.5 of 2 votes!Rate File:

Comments (34 comment(s))

    Vet's Wife wrote on Aug 6, 2009 1:41 AM:

    " You out there need to know the whole story and this paper has not printed it, they've only printed the negative. I've worked for this family and they would give me the shirt off their back if I needed it. Ryan's blood achahol level from that night, from 2 different hosp. was a 0.000 level, one of which is a nationally known trauma center. The police have known about someone running from the car seconds after the car rolled. There is more to the story and you do not have all the facts. What would you do if you were in the same position? Wouldn't you want the truth of what happened, not a bunch of fabrications? "

    Hava-NY-er wrote on Aug 2, 2009 1:10 PM:

    " I've, personally, learned a few things from reading the comments on here. Bravo for some level-headed people submitting their thoughts on this issue. I'd like to see oversight on the payout dollars. While I'm, definetly, not happy about the Meehans getting $1 let alone $250K out of this avoidable situation 100% of the money better be going for medical bills and we better not be seing a new car or boat in their driveway. "

    TazDave wrote on Aug 1, 2009 6:53 AM:

    " The bigger question is, has the city fixed the issue with the insurance company or are they changing carriers? "

    oldone wrote on Jul 30, 2009 9:39 PM:

    " Luvnhavasu I was stating a fact not a openion. I don't think the family should get anything, and yes the Leagle system in this country is a mess. The Judges and jurys give the most fouled up decision and we have to live with them. "

    Beyond Today wrote on Jul 30, 2009 6:44 PM:

    " I don't know how they say this will not cost the city. I'm sure this will help increase the city's insurance rating, making their premiums higher. And now the claims against the city will be on the rise, proving it's easy money. As with most cities, there are claims filed everyday, some make it to the public, others are quietly paid. It's just to bad this claim was paid. "

    AZ/ND wrote on Jul 30, 2009 12:37 PM:

    " WATCHING HAVASU DIE ....13 yrs old they know why an what "spakin the monkey" is all about an anyway what the HECK does this have to do with this article "

    bobo wrote on Jul 30, 2009 12:14 PM:

    " Most legal decisions are based on precedent. This sure sets a bad one! "

    lhccr wrote on Jul 30, 2009 10:37 AM:

    " luvnhavasu said it best! It's a shame. I went to school with Ryan and knew him proir to his unfortunate accident. He will never be the same due to the injuries he has sustained. Though, he caused his own injuries, not the city. The city is not responsible for his lack of good judgement. He put other lives in danger. Do his parents even consider that he is extremely lucky that nobody else was injured?? It is a tragic ending for his family, but it was also his choice to get behind the wheel intoxicated, and to flee from the police. The city didn't force him to do any of this. I pity the Meehans, they have no integrity or class for pointing blame to everyone else. "

    VoiceOfReason wrote on Jul 30, 2009 9:37 AM:

    " Tip of the hat to "lifer" and "luvnhavasu".

    hey "watching"...that was an incredibly random comment, but you definitely have a point. "

    luvnhavasu wrote on Jul 30, 2009 9:19 AM:

    " Listening or reading a report from an attorney or judge on what they deem to be "legally" correct does NOT make it morally correct. The facts will NEVER change....this punk drove a vehicle intoxicated. Period. While said punk was driving intoxicated, he attempted to evade police. Period. If you can change those facts, you might get some of us to understand. Until then, please refrain from trying to justify an unjust legal system that proves time and time again how the criminals always come out on the sweet side. Wrong is wrong.......and if you can stand there and say what Ryan Meehan did was right, then you should have been on the same road he was that night. Maybe watching some drunk punk driving out of control with police chasing him as his car is heading in your direction....or the direction of your family member, would be an eye opener. Maybe then we wouldn't be referred to listen to some judges verdict on an EXTORTION case!! "

    lhcff13 wrote on Jul 30, 2009 9:04 AM:

    " This is a disgusting example of our society today...
    Instead of taking responsibility for your actions, lets blame it on someone else. Makes me want to vomit... "

    lhcff13 wrote on Jul 30, 2009 9:01 AM:

    " Thomas and Caren, I would be ashamed to take the money. Your son put alot of people in danger that day. All I know is if someone hit me while running from the police, the police would be the least of their worries... "

    oldone wrote on Jul 29, 2009 11:25 PM:

    " The Judge in the case told the Jury they could not find the city 0%at fault so they gave 18% fault. That was stated by the Attorny handling our case. Listen to his report on the citys web site. "

    Mr. Havasu wrote on Jul 29, 2009 10:18 PM:

    " What a bunch of lowlifes, I would be too embarassed to take the money if my kid did this. "

    luvnhavasu wrote on Jul 29, 2009 10:11 PM:

    " Novelidea-Wait a minute! So are you saying that the media reported a false story? Ryan Meehan WASN'T trying to evade the police?? He WASN'T intoxicated?? Because I'm not quite sure what your point is. What did the media or the police dept state that was incorrect?? Because those 2 factors are HUGE and are what make this case the most absurd that it is. Since it has all been settled and they have walked away with a big chunk of money and you know the family, please...entertain us all with the reasons the family you know so well gave you on why they felt they were entitled to hold an entire city responsible for something their son did.....why is the city supposed to be responsible to them when they haven't made their son responsible for what he did?? I'm sorry....I moved here just after this incident happened, but I can assure you, if I had been a citizen in this town when it did, I would seek civil legal action against their son. And we all get the fact of why the city agreed to this extortion case, it would have cost more in the end, blah, blah, blah....but it doesn't make it right and this is our place to voice our disgrace. The legal system is unjust....we get that, someone prior said it best,"Once again, law breakers, dead-beats and criminals have more rights than law-abiding, decent people". DISGRACEFUL!!! "

    Hidija wrote on Jul 29, 2009 6:57 PM:

    " I posted a comment earlier this morning???? Was something offensive in it????? Why wasn't it publishee? Or am I wasting my time commenting??? "

    BLAZO wrote on Jul 29, 2009 4:33 PM:

    " I'm with azgirl28. Counter sue the Meehans. "

    WATCHING HAVASU DIE wrote on Jul 29, 2009 3:10 PM:

    " Hey what about that VULGAR company named "WET MONKEY" How do I explain to my 13 yr old some that he cant where a "Spank The Monkey" t-shirt??? "

    AZ/ND wrote on Jul 29, 2009 1:58 PM:

    " "novelidea" PLEASE like we all dont know the story of these kind of BLOOD SUCKERS "

    lifer wrote on Jul 29, 2009 1:49 PM:

    " ridiculous,
    Actually, the city's responsibility is protecting our tax dollars. By doing the 'wrong' thing, they saving perhaps millions if another jury decides to award this family money. Don't think it's possible, we've seen worse jury rulings. By agreeing to this, not one penny of tax dollars were spent, as the money is coming from the insurance company, not the city. And the city is no longer with this company. It's not as if we would get the money back if we fought and won. "

    novelidea wrote on Jul 29, 2009 11:02 AM:

    " You shouldn't believe everything you read. I happen to know the family. There are many things in this world that are left wide open for interpretation and this is one of them. Interpreted by the MEDIA and the PD. Maybe you should all realize the Media is out to make things sound better /worse than they are. Good news doesn't make for good reading material. Bad news sells. Check your sources people...don't believe everything the media says!! "

    LHCwasteland wrote on Jul 29, 2009 10:48 AM:

    " This is the kind of stupidity the city of Lake Havasu is all about. Why do you think I took the name Lake Havasu City Wasteland a couple years ago. Yet there are those that will chime in and call the rest bashers that are telling it like it is. "

    Dutchoven wrote on Jul 29, 2009 10:42 AM:

    " It has always amazed me how an entire group can get together to voice their opinion and nothing much comes of it. But when one individual cries foul, the rules change. With this case of extortion, anyone can cash in. With so many unemloyed and struggling to get by, I bet there will be some crafting "accidents" coming our way. Best of luck to them. "

    Cherry wrote on Jul 29, 2009 9:48 AM:

    " Once again, law breakers, dead-beats and criminals have more rights than law-abiding, decent people. Even illegals are more legal than us. WRITE TO YOUR REPRESENTATIVES and COMPLAIN. DO IT NOW - before it gets worse. They are the ones pushing laws to protect these leeches. You think taxpayers are taking it in the shorts with regard to this case - wait until Congress gets done. Unfortunately, Havasu is caught between a rock and a much harder place with this case. "

    ridiculous wrote on Jul 29, 2009 9:45 AM:

    " Sometimes doing the right thing (NOT SETTLING) runs the risk of costing more... But at least you would have done the RIGHT thing. Insurance companies are not in the business of doing the right thing, they're in the business of making money (or minimizing losses regardless of right or wrong). The city, representing the citizens, have an obligation to uphold justice, right over wrong, ESPECIALLY when the city already won one lawsuit that awarded no damages.

    Our city council need to temper their quasi-business sense with the expectations of the citizens they represent. Very disappointing...

    This action may have not cost the city a dime this time (insurance paid this) - however, you have now set a dangerous precendent that every ambulance chasing attorney saw - You have made it more difficult for our Law Enforcement to their job, you have opened yourself to Attoney's now over analyzing everything you do, and you thought it was bad before - It's about to get worse - And you probably thought that couldn't have...

    Just ridiculous! "

    jjrrhh wrote on Jul 29, 2009 9:17 AM:

    " Frivolous lawsuits are common place and while the populace majority says they believe fighting for what is right, regardless of cost, the simple fact of the matter is, “there’s a time and place.” Those with unlimited resources and no care of the monetary, time and emotional cost to fight to be proven right can fight legal battles such as these, but it is an emotional fight for the principal and not the logical fight for the ultimate monetary cost. The mayor and other elected officials are doing what the average person would do if placed between a rock and a hard place. Would have liked the city to fund an emergency city-wide populace vote to determine what the voter’s want?

    Does this issue, and similar issues found in other cities and arenas, point to a larger problem where our judicial system is abused? Absolutely; however, blaming the mayor and other elected officials is asinine. Should the Meehan’s have been able to bring a case against the city? No, but they found a lawyer who would. We are a lawsuit-happy nation and it is what it is.

    Do the Meehan’s deserve any money whatsoever? Absolutely not, and since I am a personal proponent of a two-year prison sentence for any individual caught drink and driving with a BAC of .08, or more I believe Ryan should have gone to prison.

    Some say this sets a “new” precedent, but they are ignorant. This issue is nothing more than a reminder or earlier precedents set.

    Ryan Meehan, and his family, worked the system and won. We reap what we sow and they have sowed. "

    ivehadit wrote on Jul 29, 2009 9:10 AM:

    " For information; The city didn't create this issue, a jury of 12 who felt sympathy for the injured. Unfortunately, they can't see past the real cause that started this whole mess and that fault lays on the violator. Instead, they felt the city could afford to pay a little because after all, he was pursued by the police. Then with the allocation of so much of 1% award for damages against the city, it opens the door for further litigation and money recovery. If you need to blame the city, put it where it belongs and that are those who made the decision to make any award. The Insurance company is looking at the best way to cut their loss and pay up. This is a common technique used by defense and plaintiff attorneys. They don't need a huge award, just a small percentage of liability, in order to reap in the cash cow. As long as we have a juror system comprised of uneducated, sympathetic judgers of illusionary fact, we will see decisions as such and payouts to non-deserving people. California mentality is moving east quickly. "

    VoiceOfReason wrote on Jul 29, 2009 8:40 AM:

    " Ok people, let's let cooler heads prevail here. Absolutely this is extortion. Councilman Barlow even said as much. And I am by no means a big fan of city government. But the city was over a barrel on this one. The insurance carrier would drop them if they didn't sign this agreement. The problem here is with the insurance carrier and the decision in the lawsuit. This was a civil lawsuit filed by the Meehans and their ambulance cha...I mean lawyer. The city was put in a no-win situation by this family. In case you haven't noticed, this thing goes on all over the country. People break a law and then find a way to blame someone else, and maybe even get rich in the process. Don't condemn our city government for a situation created by society. I really think they made the decision they had to. If they didn't sign, had the insurance cancelled, then down the road had to pay out of city coffers a large sum, I'm betting all of you would be up in arms that they hadn't signed. Remember, what the Meehans are getting is being paid by insurance. It stinks that they are making money on this, but at least it is covered by the city's insurance. In a no-win situation like this, the city did well to make the decision that does not jeopardize city funds. "

    azgirl28 wrote on Jul 29, 2009 8:20 AM:

    " I'm going to sue the Meehans for $250,000 plus court costs because I was on the road that day and their son put me at risk by running from the police and driving at excessive speeds. Anyone else want to join me? "

    man in the shadows wrote on Jul 29, 2009 7:43 AM:

    " First of all again we are held hostage by an insurance company as we are in health insurance if the story we are getting is true. The Meehan's should be ashamed of themselves for extorting monies from us or an insurance company. SHAME ON YOU. As already stated take your money and go some where else. I cant believe that we allow this to happen. Our city council seems to have no problem just giving money away. NO SPINE. Well I guess whats done is done and again Meehan's shame on you and please dont spend your extortion monies at my store. "

    luvnhavasu wrote on Jul 29, 2009 7:24 AM:

    " I don't really think that the city should worry too much about whether or not this makes them seem liable or asmitting guilt. I think the biggest concern should be what message did they just send??Basically it seems as if you can pretty much live or visit Havasu and commit crimes and guess what??? You will walk away with at the very least $250K. People come out here on big weekends, get totally hammered, sit in the channel(where there are BIG signs warning of the carbon monoxide issue)fall into the water and drown......and somehow, that is the City's fault. This guy was INTOXICATED and could have killed anyone of us reading this or any member of our families and he gets a quarter of a million dollars?? U-n-b-e-l-i-e-v-e. I say he should be sued for endangering the 50 thousand plus lives that live in this town. When are we going to make people take RESPONSIBILITY for their OWN actions??? "

    Roco wrote on Jul 29, 2009 7:18 AM:

    " Stupid!!! Stupid!!! Stupid!!! It seems like the insurance company and the council does not want to do the right thing. Just wait until another situation comes up where a person broke the law and gets hurt. The precedent has been in place. Instead of doing the right thing and make the criminal pay for their crime, the city may have more of these situations to deal with. Break the law and get paid. "

    Monkey wrote on Jul 29, 2009 5:15 AM:

    " There must be something the tax payers do not understand about this case, the person was drunk driving, running from the police and not wearing a seat belt and he gets
    $250,000.00 for breaking the law. I understand he was hurt but maybe this happens when you are drunk driving. Saying this was some how the law enforcement fault is be on my comprehension. The settlement should be he and his family have to pay all court cost and attorney fees and get nothing. "

    TRUTH wrote on Jul 28, 2009 11:13 PM:

    " ABSOLUTE BULL CRAP............ HOPEFULLY THEY WILL TAKE THE EXTORTION MONEY AND MOVE SOMEWHERE ELSE...........AND TAKE THE COUNCIL WITH THEM! "

WRITE A COMMENT

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone and we reserve the right to withhold or remove any comment from publication.

Do not post:
    * Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
    * Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
    * Personal attacks, insults or threats.
    * The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
    * Comments unrelated to the story.


Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in havasunews.com's story comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of Today's News Herald. Today's News Herald provides an interactive computer service and does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Today's News Herald spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
 
e-Edition

VIDEOS

American Profile

e-Edition

e-Edition

Special Sections








View All Special Sections

Readers' Poll

Calendar

Stocks