Parker Pioneer Stocks Orchids & Onions Obituaries Calendar Weather Public Notices Archives Clip n' Save Coupons
Weather Magnet

BLM reviews Lake vendor contract
Up to 2 vendors may be allowed at Rotary Park

By NATHAN BRUTTELL
Today's News-Herald
Published Wednesday, November 4, 2009 9:09 PM MST

Up to two vendors may be allowed back to Rotary Beach next summer, but it may be awhile before the city knows for sure.


The Bureau of Land Management state office is currently reviewing a possible agreement with the city to once again allow shoreline vendors at Rotary Beach. City staff made recommendations in October based on City Council thoughts and is currently awaiting word from the state. Shoreline vending opportunities will look severely different next year, with only the possibility of two personal watercraft vendors allowed to return.

BLM Lake Havasu City Assistant Field Manager Mike Henderson believes the agreement is close to completion.

“I want that agreement signed prior to the next boating season, and hopefully we can get it out prior to March,” he said. “Right now, it is at our state office in Phoenix, and our Recreation Program Lead is reviewing the agreement.”

Henderson said he also expects to get an answer about the potential vendor selection process for the two locations.

“If we get a lot of inquiries for the limited number of permits then there will either be a lottery or it will go out for bid,” Henderson said. “Right now, that has not been decided yet and we have six inquiries. We will know more once an agreement is put in place and we see the applications we get.”

Henderson said the BLM office would also look into the possible unfair market competition created with two vendors on the beach and the rest within the city.

“That is going to depend on several things but right now, we don’t have anything established,” he said. “Once we start getting proposals, part of our process will include doing market comparisons to make sure there isn’t that unfair advantage.”

City Senior Planner Stuart Schmeling said the agreement is no longer a negotiation, but that the BLM would outline parameters for the city to follow. The city will also have no more say as to how many vendors are allowed on the beach and the process behind it, Schmeling said.

“The BLM takes the applications and runs them through the National Environmental Protection Agency process and based on set criteria, determine what vendors will receive the annual permits,” he said. “From what I understand, the BLM has the authority to grant multiple years in their contracts but all of the contract negotiations are up to them, and the city has nothing to do with that.”

Schmeling said the council agreed to no more than two vendors allowed at Rotary Park Beach, and the city’s recommendations were based on area and proximity to other locations.

“Once we as staff started looking at the entire length of the beaches at Rotary (Park) and London Bridge, we saw two was really all we could accommodate safely,” he said. “After we took the swim areas where we thought they would be appropriate, it became apparent that any more vendors would be coming too close to the Channel or be sitting in shallow water.”

Mayor Mark Nexsen said two or three vendors would be appropriate and that the City Council would again look at the possibility of food vendors on the beaches but would no longer consider shoreline food vendors.

“We all agreed it needed to be limited, and we felt two or three was best but it’s about what we can accommodate,” he said. “More land might open up at a later date, but that’s all we can do right now.”

Schmeling said the City Council could review potential beach vendors at its regular meeting Nov. 24. He added the city is also still interested in obtaining state land along London Bridge Beach for another possible vendor to be added at a later date.

“We have sent a letter to the state trust that we would be interested in utilizing and doing improvements to that part of the beach,” he said. The state has not reacted to it so far but we are still attempting to secure that land.”

The city could also discuss the possibility of an additional fee structure for the shoreline vendors, Schmeling added, so that fees compare to property taxes and other permits and park fees utilized currently for businesses within the city.

You can contact the reporter at nbruttell@havasunews.com.

Article Rating

    Current Rating: 3 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Comments (4 comment(s))

    FORMER JUDGE wrote on Nov 5, 2009 3:56 PM:

    " A Havasu Resident is talking thru his a-- There are more vendors in the channel now (what a perfect place to have people learn how to operate a watercraft) The channel had nothing to do with the lake vendors,,,Just another BLOW HARD "

    mogas wrote on Nov 5, 2009 11:42 AM:

    " The beach belongs to the LHC public! Those vendors have been squatting there too long already...please remove those eyesores from our beach permanently.. "

    tritoon wrote on Nov 4, 2009 11:51 PM:

    " I'm strongly against any vendors along Rotary Beach or the Channel and can't believe that anyone without a self serving interest would support this. Someone other than the perspective squatters, sorry vendors, or the community at large must have an undisclosed upside here. Unless the proposed permit fees are $10k per month it isn't the City. Mark, Stuart, Larry - any dogs in this hunt? Allowing our prime beaches to look like a Quartzsite trailer park will deter, not expand tourism - wise up people and demand that this action be terminated! "

    A Havasu Resident wrote on Nov 4, 2009 11:28 PM:

    " I, for one, wish they would keep the vendors off of the lake. The channel looks so much better since the vendors have been removed. I say, keep the eyesores off the lake and let the public have access to be beaches again! "

WRITE A COMMENT

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone and we reserve the right to withhold or remove any comment from publication.

Do not post:
    * Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
    * Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
    * Personal attacks, insults or threats.
    * The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
    * Comments unrelated to the story.


Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in havasunews.com's story comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of Today's News Herald. Today's News Herald provides an interactive computer service and does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Today's News Herald spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
 
e-Edition

VIDEOS

American Profile

e-Edition

e-Edition

Special Sections








View All Special Sections

Readers' Poll

Calendar

Stocks