Parker Pioneer Orchids & Onions Grocery Smarts Obits Calendar Weather Public Notices Archives
Weather Magnet

Receiver appointed for Shops at Lake Havasu

By JACKIE LEATHERMAN
Today's News-Herald
Published Wednesday, August 25, 2010 10:19 PM MST

Wolford Development Inc., the company that developed and owns The Shops at Lake Havasu, is no longer in control of the property.


Mohave County Superior Court Judge Charles Gurtler appointed a receiver — or a third-party to take control of the property — Tuesday for the 109-acre site off State Route 95.

Wolford Development Inc., based in Tennessee, did not return messages seeking comment or further explanation of the situation Wednesday.

David Jewkes, the executive director of Receiverships/Management Service for Commerce TNP, LLC, is now in control of the property, as appointed by the court.

Jewkes, based in Las Vegas, did not return a message late Wednesday afternoon.

Alabama-based Regions Bank, the financial lender for The Shops, filed a civil suit in Mohave Superior Court Aug. 20 requesting the receiver.

The Phoenix-based law firm representing Regions Bank, Snell & Wilmer LLP, did not return two messages seeking comment or further explanation of the situation Wednesday.

Madeleine Wanslee, an attorney with Phoenix-based law firm Gust Rosenfeld PLC, said the “lender is probably owed money and the mall has not paid that money so they are delinquent.”

Wanslee sits on the State Bar of Arizona’s executive council for bankruptcy. Neither she nor the law firm she works for is affiliated with The Shops at Lake Havasu’s civil court case.

Today’s News-Herald asked for the State Bar’s assistance to help explain receivership and was directed toward the bankruptcy council. Wanslee provided a basic legal explanation of a receiver situation.

Wanslee said typically in these cases of receivership, the owners are delinquent, but continuing to collect rent, but “meanwhile they are not paying their debts associated with the property.”

The lender then asks the court to appoint a receiver to take control of the property, to collect the rent and to preserve the property, Wanslee said.

“Generally, it’s in connection with a foreclosure process,” she said.

Wanslee said three typical outcomes of a property being in receivership include the property owners amending their debts, starting a foreclosure process or bankruptcy.

She said amending the debts or bankruptcy were typically the only ways property owners could regain control of their property.

“It has to be a pretty serious thing in order to appoint receivers,” she said. “Getting a receiver appointed is pretty expensive. It’s not a small undertaking. It is a big thing.”

Several managers of retail shops at the city’s only major outdoor shopping plaza — including one major retailer — said Wednesday they had not heard of the court case. The retailers declined to be named.

Gary Kellogg, president and CEO of the Lake Havasu City Partnership for Economic Development, was on vacation Wednesday and unavailable for comment.

Lisa Krueger, president and CEO of the Lake Havasu Area Chamber of Commerce, said she learned about the receivership Wednesday morning but did not know further details.

Wolford Development, Inc. started opening shops in March 2008, including Dillard’s, JCPenny, UltraStar Cinemas, Wal-Mart and smaller retail shops.

You may contact the reporter at jleatherman@havasunews.com

Article Rating

    Current Rating: 3.7 of 3 votes!Rate File:

Comments (42 comment(s))

    momto2inlhc wrote on Oct 15, 2010 1:36 PM:

    " These comments amaze me! I carry a baby, push a stroller, and all my bags to every single one of these store, all while pregnant also! No wonder soooo many people are obese and/or jobless! YOUR LAZY!! It is not far to walk to Dillards from Walmart. If people opened their eyes and saw that it was due to city "rules and guideline" why a bunch of store didnt end up coming here,maybe the community would VOTE, or at least speak up at city counsel meetings. You need to be the community you want to see! It starts with you, and us. And Im sorry all you older people who do not want the city to grow ARE SELFISH! We are families here raising kids that need GOOD EDUCATION and we ALL need JOBS, so let these businesses come in and bring in jobs, tax dollars and keep it local. I drive to California and Vegas for COSTCO, Target, BabiesRus, and MUCH more, because I NEED these items, as do a lot of people. "

    twocitiesdweller wrote on Sep 4, 2010 5:06 PM:

    " When I originaly saw the Mall was going to be a outdoor strip type mall I shuddered. I have been around indoor Malls for over 55 yeras and this has been in Calif. I have seen people of all ages in malls walkig and window shopping and believe it or not they do go into those buisnesses and buy hings as imulse buyers. BNow to our new avasu Mall I go there only when I need somthing from a specialty store there, we park as close to the particular store we are going into shop and get back to the car as quick as possible. When this fry pan was built they could have installed Solar Panels for electricity to run AIR CONDITIONING and made it indoors, people would have come in droves and vendors would have filled all of those empty store fronts for the Havasu residents to spend their dollars. The builder had his head where the sun don't shine and our city fathers wern't smart enough to not approve the outdoor concept. I dealt with the city in the mid 90's when building a buisness in Havasu City and they were not real smart at that time and it doesn't get any better. Have owned a home in Havasu since 1989 and watched it grow in spite of bad city decisions. Good luck to the new management of the Mall I hope you find a way to cool it down and draw in the locals dollars. "

    Victoria wrote on Sep 4, 2010 8:53 AM:

    " Lifer, you have a point but if they would have incorporated solar energy into the plan it would have offset the cost of A/C in not time. The tax credits and rebates make it very afordable.
    Samo Samo, you are right there are also outdoor malls in San Diego . However, whenever the weather is a bit blustery or hot the indoor malls draw the crowds. "

    sameo sameo wrote on Sep 3, 2010 9:52 PM:

    " Victoria, when I lived in San Diego the following Malls were all "open air":
    University City Mall
    Fashion Valley Mall
    Mission Valley Mall
    Downtown Gas Lamp District
    College Ave. Mall
    Grossmont Center Mall
    ElCajon Center Mall
    Oceanside Mall
    When did they enclose and aircondition all these malls? "

    lifer wrote on Sep 3, 2010 4:47 PM:

    " It's been said on here by myself and several others many times, that no malls like the old, enclosed malls, are being built anymore. The overhead of the air conditioning alone forces rents that are too high for anyone to afford. Just think, the stores can't afford rent as it is. Jack it up even more, you'd just have an empty in door mall. Sure, the seniors could walk around in their track suits, but that doesn't generate revenue. "

    victoria wrote on Sep 2, 2010 3:12 PM:

    " I was suprised that they built an outdoor type "mall" in a town with such exteme heat in the summer and blustery winters. My other home town San Diego has pretty nice weather all year round but every sucessful mall is an enclosed climate controlled environment. Could you imagine how many people would be at the mall right now if it were air conditioned? You can really get cabin fever living in an area where it is this hot. What a treat to spend the day at the (indoor) mall, stroll, shop, eat, take in a movie etc. What a shame to have wasted all of that effort to build an outdoor mall that few can enjoy for months each year. "

    5293 wrote on Sep 2, 2010 12:16 PM:

    " The problem with the mall is that it is an open-air mall, plain and simple. Hardly anyone goes to the mall just to go to the mall - people go when they have to go to walmart or are looking for something.

    Had it been built as an enclosed mall with airconditioning, it would have been a hangout for many different types of people and would be much busier.

    Obviously the builders weren't from around here. "

    oldone wrote on Sep 1, 2010 2:40 PM:

    " Had it! The roads in the complex are private not city the lies were put in by ADOT not the city. The city did make a deal for infrastructure, looking to get it back in sales tax. The highway was widend by ADOT also. "

    Beyond Today wrote on Aug 31, 2010 7:59 PM:

    " "Had It" I bet you would be happy if this town had one gas station, one grocery store/bank/post office and we could go back to the early 60"s. We're out in the middle of nowhere, how else to you expect to entice growth, something it sounds that you do not want. In regards to Southwest/ Bradley Chevrolet location, though they got that for a deal, how much tax base has that brought into the city? How many jobs has it created? The properties on the corner of Industrial and London Bridge Road will go up for auction next month and i'm sure the buyer will get if for way below market value. What goes in will bring tax money along with jobs, something this town is in dire need of. "

    wabash wrote on Aug 31, 2010 7:45 PM:

    " Had It with Havasu, you make good points. But you are dead wrong about the shopping selection. If it wasn't for Dillard's, I'd have to go out of town to buy clothes. And lay off the crap about Bruce Williams. It's very tiresome. He's a convenient whipping post. ADEQ had some pretty firm ideas about Havasu's need for a sewer system, remember? What is it about Havasu that everything has to get so doggone personal? Why can't you knuckleheads stick to the issues? "

    blackcat wrote on Aug 31, 2010 6:38 PM:

    " Didn't this thing take 20 years to get going as it was? Maybe they should have waited? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5jwTpKLgto "

    Had it with Havasu wrote on Aug 31, 2010 10:59 AM:

    " The city had engineering done, built roads and installed traffic signals, etc. to accommodate this venture. Wolford was responsible for $3.7 million in infrastructure costs which the city forgave, shifting the burden to you and me. The argument being that the shops would bring in tax revenue.

    Really.

    Faulty argument. There isn't anything out there that you couldn't already find in town. The demographic never existed to support this fantasy regarding increased tax revenue. Never will. FWIW, as Southwest Chevrolet (now Bradley) negotiated with the city in the mid 90's I suggested an Airport Auto Center (in the county) to entice the city into being more accommodating. The price for the old city yard on LH Ave. went from $900,000.00 to free. That is how this works. The dealer had negotiated a price in the mid 300's prior to the inference of then city manager Bruce Williams, stepping in and raising the price. Point is, these buffoons running the city are clueless, hence, Wolford stiffs us for millions just for the asking.

    City leaders lost their focus, lost it when Bruce Williams became city manager with suggestions of a municipal sewer system throughout the city. It's been downhill ever since with the citizens who support this community being burdened with the fantastic costs associated with inept leadership. And our city leaders refer to this sewer extortion project as "Our very own stimulus package". Stimulus for who?

    Tomorrow marks a push for yet another burden, the school override. Get ready, they'll tell us it is all for the kids. Ignoring the fact that school funding has doubled while quality of education has declined.

    Throwing money at education won't make it better, it will just fund the same modus operandi for years to come. Well past time for them to figure it out. "

    Beyond Today wrote on Aug 30, 2010 3:14 PM:

    " You people should probably think about getting out a little more often in the real world. Cities should and do pay into the off-site improvements and incentives of major developments. In this case it was probably for water and sewer lines. More than likely the same lines that will be used for the refuge. The mall will not be torn down, it will continue to be leased and new businesses will open. The 3.7 mil will be paid back tenfold over the years in sales tax receipts. The developer had over 30 times the money invested than what Havasu invested. This is not an isolated case of receivership, it goes on nationwide on a daily basis.Until people are willing to start spending money again and start the ball rolling it will take this nation awhile to recover. "

    oldone wrote on Aug 30, 2010 12:36 PM:

    " blackriver the question was asked at the council meeting about the Refuge. What if the Refuge plan fails and the bank takes it back their was no answer from any Council member just a collective dumb look and blank stare. "

    oldone wrote on Aug 30, 2010 12:32 PM:

    " This Council was not seated when the mall deal was made. Also the 3mil was not a loan. but the same deal as many cities make and get back in tax dollars. Not sure if that happend here though. "

    Real Havasuvian wrote on Aug 30, 2010 9:43 AM:

    " Had it with Havasu, are you saying the city paid $3,700,000 to build the mall?

    So Wolford got $3,700,000 to build the mall and even with all that paid for them there still isn't enough money every month to pay the remaining debt service?

    That's why the taxpayers should not be subsidizing private businesses.

    Think about it. If you had a business in town, like all the half empty malls on McCulloch, for example, and you were paying your own bills and maybe losing money for a while, and then Wolford comes in from Tennessee and competes with you for tenants and uses tax money to do it, YOUR tax money.

    Not really fair, if you ask me. "

    Had it with Havasu wrote on Aug 30, 2010 9:33 AM:

    " Wolford was on the hook for $3,700,000 with LHC for infrastructure improvements.

    Wolford told LHC that they couldn't move forward with that note hanging over them.

    LHC determined you and I could bear those costs rather than Wolford so they could build this useless mall which hurt local businesses who have supported Havasu for decades.

    Wolford built the mall but failed to secure enough anchor clients. Their plan called for 13 auto dealerships, which made me laugh out loud years ago.

    Still, city government and planners laid the burden of costs on you and me. Just like they want to do now with The Refuge. "

    Help! wrote on Aug 30, 2010 9:09 AM:

    " Amazing...a private enterprise fails, one that has been planned for...uhhhh...at least the 20 years I've lived here and it is somehow city council's fault? You people are crazy. The economy sucks, people don't have the money to spend, town has not grown like it was projected to. But this is somehow the mayor's fault...we should be offering more incentives for businesses to come here, not less. From what I know, hands are tied on what the city's can offer in AZ due to AZ laws. Look at the business park, the most that could be done is free land...for one business, certainly not much of a pull. I love the mall, they have great service, the best thing we can do is buy locally and not go to Prescott to shop. BTW-funny those of you who slam city council, but the two incumbents were just voted in again and nobody even bothered to run against the mayor. "

    blazo wrote on Aug 30, 2010 7:58 AM:

    " The ones on hear whining about having to drive a few miles to the new mall are the same morons who'll drive all the way to Vegas to save fifty-cents on a bag of kitty litter. Need some cheese with that whine mam? "

    blackriver wrote on Aug 29, 2010 8:16 PM:

    " The Mayors next plan annexing the Refuge, another great idea? "

    Real Havasuvian wrote on Aug 29, 2010 12:52 PM:

    " If that mall were completely privately built there wouldn't be much of a problem. But I suspect the City paid for a good portion of it. Either land, tax incentives, or something. It wasn't built completely with private funds by Wolford of Tennessee.

    In any case, the idea that a mall in Lake Havasu should be an open air strip mall design, and that's the *best* that can be designed for here, where the temperature tops 120 degrees regularly, that's just ridiculous.

    Nobody is going to go to Walmart, then stroll over to Dillards, past all the little stores and food court in between. That would be impossible, you could die out there. I bet Dillards is scratching their heads, though. "Why is that Havasu store so slow?".

    This could have been done privately, or it could have been done by a local developer who had a clue about the climate here.

    Some mall developer from Tennessee with the city paying for the mall, or a big part, that was just ridiculous. Wolford knew how to play the game, get government incentives.

    They just had no idea what was *necessary*.

    Air conditioning, that is *necessary*.

    Not to mention it's 12 miles from my house, in the center of town. Some people who live in the Havasu area probably have to drive 15 or more miles to get to that mall. That has to affect sales. All the money they are losing, caused by distance and no air conditioning.

    Like I said, if I wasn't afraid the city paid for a lot of it, I wouldn't much care. "

    Jabberwockies Uncle I told you so wrote on Aug 28, 2010 7:33 PM:

    " I Recall speaking with a store owner at the mall. A clothing store. I walked into the store and noticed a nice pair of jean pants. The cost: $ 270.00 - for a pair of jeans. In my mind- I thought WOW is this store in trouble. Anyone living in Havasu for more than a year knows most struggle to earn a paycheck of 270 bucks, let alone buy a single pair of jeans. So being curious, I began talking to the owner - he told me he owns a very successful Las Vegas store. He was approached by this corporation which showed him a business plan of a thriving mall - including at the time, 17 additional businesses "signed to come here" and a video depicting hundreds of people walking around, buying, eating, etc... So he did whatever he did, and arranged to open his store here at the "new" mall. Essentially, he was lied to. He told me about several people he knew in Vegas that were "waiting" to hear what he had to say- so they could determine whether or not they would follow him with their businesses. We all know what happened. Good by forever- and another BLACK mark on Lake Havasu City. It never ceases to amaze me how every idea I hear people talking about it turned down, or we hear: Oh, well we use to have that here, but it went out of business.-- Five steps forward, eight steps back... What a City - What a life... This City needs a vibrant transformation. The Island, the Channel, the English Village, EVERYTHING! And fast. People are dying here financially folks in power, GET A GRIP! "

    johnjay wrote on Aug 28, 2010 3:47 PM:

    " Ok what am I missing.
    1) Storage Units on the Island
    2) Industrial on the water
    3) Main Street miles from London Bridge
    4) An OPEN mall 10 miles out of town in a city that has 120 degree temperatures during the summer.
    5) On top of this spending 400 million dollars you don't have.

    Is this by design, I don't understand, what am I missing? Why are these decisions made? A five year knows you can't buy candy with out money in your pocket and find someplace cool when it's hot out. "

    GMC wrote on Aug 28, 2010 2:11 PM:

    " Does anyone understand that the city does not tell a builder what to build. The city only look at the project and make sure all zoning it legal. They do not make the call on if it will be a open or closed mall.They do not decide on with stores will be there. You can not blame the city for that a builder does with their own money. It is the same as building a home, the city approve the basic plans,but does not tell you that you are building a house that everone will love. "

    dudu2 wrote on Aug 28, 2010 11:45 AM:

    " The Mall was as bad idea as a Refuge and the taxpayers have to pay for it and bail them out again and again.
    Who wants to walk store to store in a 120F temperature? The senior citizens? The mall is 90% empty you have a lots of walking to do and that dying 10 % stores are changing every week. I could name at least 10 businesses who went belly up or did not came. Who wants to drive 10 miles to the Wal-Mart when we have a K-mart in the center of the city? People don't have any place to walk socialize in the heat. A closed mall with an ice skating ring would be more viable. People could walk, breath, socialize and spend more money.
    The Mall was our city leaders only and last magic bullet, it did not worked. It is time to put the City in bankruptcy and starting it over instead of raise the taxes, sewer fees and drive the last taxpaying and working people out. Our city leaders agenda is: ruin the city, drive the people out and buy it for $1 on a bankruptcy sale. Most of the voters are happy with this and voting for the same mayor and council members. They don't deserve any better! "

    commansense1 wrote on Aug 28, 2010 10:00 AM:

    " visited Prescott Valley MALL yesterday....thriving, full, ...oh yeah it had a roof and A/C....it's a MALL.......Havasu has a desolate strip shopping center that is not condusive to any outdoor related retail gathering of the general public! Misters....really? Picazzo's packed on weekend nights....nobody on the patio!

    Prescoot MALL 30 degrees cooler..could have built outdoor shopping plaza! But chose not to.....result....full food court, full kids play area with mom's & dad's, seniors walking & exercising as they window shop for later visits....and all these people using and visiting retailers and food vendors....and guess what ENJOYING their MALL.
    Havasu people run from the Walmart to their cars and crank up the air as they whisk away down the road and comment about what should have been....as they pass the empty Dillard's where the hawkish sales people unfortunately work for comission(sp) only! How sad........

    but there is hope as I have read. A different owner can negotiate better leases, perhaps the main Isle of the "Plaza" can be covered to create a genuine "MALL" atmosphere, and maybe we can get more retailers that the public will choose to use, i.e. Kohl's "

    oldone wrote on Aug 27, 2010 2:07 PM:

    " havasures: "here we go again" meaning here comes the comments from left and right field. "

    Reality Check wrote on Aug 27, 2010 9:57 AM:

    " The owner of the mall stopped paying their bills because the mall is virtually empty. You cannot sustain the cost of a development like this mall with out a VERY high occupancy rate (90%+). The local economy does support a Walmart but there is no way it can support DIllards and countless small shops. It is an unfortunate turn of events which the mall owners are stuck with. Just like other distressed areas, this property will be sold at a more realistic price (current market value), then the new landlord will be able to structure leases which make sense for the tenets and, eventually, the mall will flourish. "

    johnjay wrote on Aug 27, 2010 9:17 AM:

    " havasures,

    You're right, what was I thinking. I declare Lake Havasu City has the greatest planning and city council ever, true intellectual giants on a par with the likes of the planners of Santorini and the builders of the Sistine Chapel. "

    havasures wrote on Aug 27, 2010 7:30 AM:

    " Seriously johnjay..."put our shopping mall out of town"...that is ridiculous. Lake Havasu City is more than just the middle section of town where Lake Havasu Ave. and McCulloch intersect. Believe it or not our town is spread out because we are growing. I remember when the Southside Bashas was built people were in an uproar because it was built "out of town"...funny the residents who live out there still believe that they are a member of Lake Havasu City. When you question where new businesses are built please tell me where you think there would have been enough land to build them. Could the Mall have been squeeze onto Mesquite perhaps, maybe on Smoketree....for those who mention Cost Co....guess where it would have gone. Ultimately, our town is expanding at that means spreading toward the north end of our city just like we did on the south side. Once again people need to remember the Mall is not having an issue. People still pack into Walmart, Pennys, PetCo and Michaels to do their shopping. The developer of the mall stop paying his bills. Why should the City Council feel bad about this? They don't feel shame when the citizens of this town stop paying their bills. "

    blazo wrote on Aug 27, 2010 6:09 AM:

    " The mall isn't out of town. From what I can tell it's within city limits. I don't mind driving 6 miles one-way to get there. What is 6-miles in a car. Geez. "

    johnjay wrote on Aug 26, 2010 7:12 PM:

    " So let me see if I understand this. You put storage units on the island across from London Bridge, Industrial on the water front property and your shopping mall out of town. Don't even know what to say. "

    ridiculous wrote on Aug 26, 2010 3:40 PM:

    " Very few predicted the economy would stumble as badly as it has for the past 5-years. The mall was NOT an impetus decision, it wasn't as if, just one day the mall was there... It took a tremendous amount of time, due diligence, construction time, and courting retailers... Very early in the project the economy started to show signs of weakness, retailers started pulling out, but constructed HAD to continue... What's happening to the mall is happening to small businesses throughout this REGION - and stories like this highlight the severity of our economy and road we face ahead. I look forward to the upswing and I hope we've all learned from this experience... "

    havasures wrote on Aug 26, 2010 12:40 PM:

    " oldone..."here we go again"????? Here we go again with WHAT?
    Real Havasuian...the mall was built way out on the edge of town? Where exactly do you propose that the mall should have been built? Where else is there that kind of space available "in town". Plus if it was built closer "in town" then wouldn't you just complain about the excess traffic?
    havasulover... the mall is NOT failing, the development company has stopped paying its bills. This is not a reflection on the status of the mall. Those shop owners are still paying all of their bills. They cannot control that their "landlord" isn't taking care of his buisness. Inevitable failure????? Based on many facts???? Jobs? Workforce? Average Salary? What in the world are you talking about? A side from JcPennys and Walmart most of the other business out there were new to Havasu, bring it with it employment opportunities for the citizens of this community. Jobs = Paychecks, Paychecks = People staying in town, People staying in town = money spent in town. All of this equals out to money flow in our town, that is never a bad thing. Are people making $20 an hour working in a retail shop? No, but they could be sitting on their couches at home collecting unemployment. Speaking of unemployment, there are still not enough jobs in this town for all those out there looking. I am talking minimum wage jobs that several people I know would be willing to do anything to get. The mall's time hasn't come? When exactly progress a bad thing? So, you don't like the traffic lights because you always have to stop on your way back in to town. Well....this just means that you, yourself, are spending your money else where than Havasu. Maybe next time you are on your way out of town, stopped at those annoying traffic lights you should consider making your travel one way. "

    blazo wrote on Aug 26, 2010 11:25 AM:

    " It'll continue to operate nontheless!

    Continued growth in a city dictates projects of this nature. Your little town 'Ma & Pa Country Store' doesn't create jobs nor bring in new residents. "

    FORD FAIRLANE wrote on Aug 26, 2010 10:34 AM:

    " Yea the City Council acted like this was a feather in their hat getting the mall built,I clean barns for a living and I knew it was gonna fail, 1st thing to do is get wolfords name off the sign, Re-Call the whole City Council "

    Reality Check wrote on Aug 26, 2010 8:55 AM:

    " This is another example of bad decisions and bad timing. If the economy and housing market had not taken such a horrible turn, things would be different at this mall. However, the developers really should have altered their plans when all indications of a rescission were in place.

    Also it amazes me that our city council was such a huge proponent of this mall (which anybody with half a brain would realize was risky) yet they ran Costco out of town (which was an absolute money maker for the city).

    Hopefully our future leaders will make much better decisions. "

    sameo sameo wrote on Aug 26, 2010 8:37 AM:

    " Sad but predictable situation when reality is ignored and bubbles burst. Will be interesting to see how the Mayor and Council put lipstick on this pig and continue our trip to fantasy land. "

    resident wrote on Aug 26, 2010 8:05 AM:

    " sounds like bashas, they have to renegotiate leases on their bubble properties. "

    havasu♥lover wrote on Aug 26, 2010 6:40 AM:

    " This isn't a bit surprising. What is surprising is that the city council ok'd this project, when they should have seen clearly that failure was inevitable - based on many facts, including jobs, work force, and average salary of Mohave County residents. The mall's time hasn't come, whether it's physically there or not. You have to love those 3 new traffic signals that we all have to stop at for no reason every time you come back into town from the 40 though! "

    Real Havasuvian wrote on Aug 26, 2010 12:02 AM:

    " Great, huh?
    How much of the taxpayers money did the city pay to have that mall built way out at the edge of town? "

    oldone wrote on Aug 25, 2010 10:58 PM:

    " Here we go again? "

WRITE A COMMENT

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone and we reserve the right to withhold or remove any comment from publication.

Do not post:
    * Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
    * Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
    * Personal attacks, insults or threats.
    * The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
    * Comments unrelated to the story.


Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in havasunews.com's story comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of Today's News Herald. Today's News Herald provides an interactive computer service and does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Today's News Herald spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
 
Havasu Home Search

e-Edition


Shop Local

American Profile

Special Sections








View All Special Sections

Readers' Poll