PHOENIX — A legislative panel is debating whether to restore the right of cities and towns to regulate short-term vacation rentals, a right that legislators and Gov. Doug Ducey took away from them three years ago.

But the idea already is getting a chilly reception from the governor.

Rep. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, who chairs the committee, said the law was sold to legislators as a way of helping homeowners earn some extra money by renting out a spare bedroom, perhaps to a visiting foreign student.

But Kavanagh, who co-chairs the panel -- and voted against the 2016 law -- said the reality is that a large share of the homes offered for rent through companies like Airbnb and VRBO are actually owned by people who don’t live there and have simply purchased the house for the specific purpose of renting it out to those who may stay just a few days.

Sen. Kate Brophy McGee, R-Phoenix, said having short-term rentals in what had been a neighborhood of owner-occupied homes means the people who live there year round don’t know who is coming and going. The result, she said, is one man told her he’s not comfortable leaving his grandchildren outside.

“It changes the character of a residential neighborhood,’’ she said.

Matt Miller, an attorney for the Goldwater Institute, brushed aside those concerns.

“Is that the role of government to come in and say that houses have to be owned by people who are going to live there for a year so that all the neighbors can know each other?’’ he said. “I don’t think that’s the role of government.’’

Brophy McGee said that misses the point.

“It’s understanding if you’re buying a property next to a hotel what you’re going to get, which is people coming, people going, different people,’’ she said. But Brophy McGee said the folks who are concerned bought their homes in areas specifically zoned for residential use.

Miller’s comments also drew an angry reaction from Rep. Isela Blanc, D-Tempe, who said there’s a world of difference between having neighbors who live there full time versus absentee owners who create de facto hotels by in residential areas, renting out the houses to different people on a daily or weekly basis.

“Why are my property rights less valuable than the person who is choosing to run a business next door to me without the proper zoning and consumer protections, neighborhood protections, neighbor protections?’’ she asked.

Miller was unconvinced.

“It’s not more valuable than yours,’’ he responded. “They can control your property and you can control yours.’’

Kavanagh said the 2016 law has created another problem. He said entire neighborhoods in some communities have now been converted into short-term rentals, drying up the availability of affordable rental housing.

The solution in Kavanagh’s mind is to once again let local city and town councils decide what restrictions work best.

That could include limiting the number of short-term rentals, both in any specific neighborhood as well as overall in the community. And Kavanagh said a limit on occupancy based on the number of bedrooms also makes sense.

But Ducey, who championed the 2016 law -- and would have to sign any new restrictions -- already is throwing cold water on such changes.


(1) comment


Why is it Republicans whine constantly about "states rights" but when it comes to county or city rights they trample all over the people?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.