Despite virus surge, Arizona governor won't require masks

FILE - In this June 11, 2020 file photo Arizona Republican Gov. Doug Ducey answers a question after he announced the latest coronavirus numbers and recent spike in cases during a news conference in Phoenix. As coronavirus cases continue to surge in Arizona, the governor shows no signs of tightening restrictions such as forcing the use of face masks.

On a per capita basis, smaller cities and counties in Arizona are getting about two-thirds of the relief funding from the CARES Act as their larger counterparts in the state. That has led some in the state to cry foul, while others have expressed appreciation at the flexibility that the plan from Gov. Doug Ducey’s office provides.

Included in the $2 trillion CARES Act signed into law by President Donald Trump on March 27 was additional relief funding for state and local governments. The U.S. Treasury provided direct payments to all cities and counties with a population over 500,000 and gave the rest of the money to the state to distribute. In Arizona, Phoenix, Tucson, and Mesa were the only three cities to receive payment from the federal government along with Maricopa and Pima counties.

All three of Arizona’s large cities were paid $174 per capita by the U.S. Treasury based on 2019 census information. But when Gov. Ducey’s office announced the state’s plans to distribute the rest of the money to smaller cities and counties, it amounted to $114 per capita.

“It is true that there is a discrepancy in what local governments received,” said Nick Ponder, Legislative Director of the Arizona League of Cities and Towns. “Much of that can be attributed to the way the law was written at the federal level. They did not account for the different makeup of all states and there wasn’t a national per capita formula, so there will always be inequities. The 88 cities and towns in Arizona who received less ($114 per capita vs $174 per capita) would certainly welcome additional dollars so that they could put those dollars to work in their community, that said we think it should be applauded that this state is one of the earliest and the most flexible in making distributions to all local governments.”

Ponder said the money being distributed through AZCARES gives cities more options to use it than the money provided to larger cities by the federal government.

“There is something to be said for flexibility and the creative process employed by the governor’s office,” he said.

In Lake Havasu City the AZCARES money works out to about $6.4 million, but the city would have received more than $9.7 million if it were paid at the same per capita rates as the large cities. But Lake Havasu City Mayor Cal Sheehy said he doesn’t feel like the smaller cities got shortchanged in the deal.

“I’m grateful to Gov. Ducey for bringing certainty to cities and towns across Arizona,” Sheehy said. “Although our funding from the Governor’s Office is less per person than direct funding to the communities with over 500,000 people, it still allows for flexibility should a specific need arise, and cities and towns across Arizona have a need for additional funding. I believe that Gov. Ducey was prudent in the way that he calculated those funds and distributed them to cities and towns with an eye on, should a need arise in a specific community, there would still be funds available for that community from the governor’s office.”

Sheehy said the city already has several priorities for the money, mostly related to public safety. He said the city will decide exactly how to spend its share of the AZCARES Fund through a series of public hearings at City Council meetings in the coming months.

Mohave County has been promised $9.1 million from AZCARES but that figure would have been $13.9 million with a $174 per capita rate. Mohave County District 5 Supervisor Ron Gould said he hasn’t yet looked too deeply into how the CARES money was divvied up throughout the state.

“It should have been fair, I’ll have to do some research into how much money the state held onto rather than passing it on to the cities and counties,” Gould said.

The bigger issue for Gould, along with District 3 Supervisor Buster Johnson, isn’t with how the money from the CARES Act was distributed, but rather how much was passed out to governments in the first place. Both supervisors said Mohave County has been able to make use of federal grants to help boost the health department during the current crisis and the county itself has spent less than $100,000 on covid-19 related expenses.

“While it’s nice to get the money and you aren’t going to turn it back because they will just give it to somebody else, it still doesn’t seem like a good use of our taxpayer money,” Johnson said. “My problem with it is it is taxpayer money that they are sending out. At our board meeting we were discussing what we were going to do with the money and it really didn’t have anything to do with covid. That bothers me. I mean, we got $9.1 million for basically nothing.”

Johnson said the supervisors have earmarked about $2.5 million of the money for capital projects, with the rest likely to go into the contingency fund that the supervisors can decide how to spend at a later date.

Gould said that judging by the situation in Mohave County, the federal government is overpaying states and local governments by millions of dollars that it can’t really afford.

“They pushed all this money out to the states and bearing in mind that they have a $25 trillion deficit,” Gould said. “The national debt is huge and they don’t have the cash. So they are creating this money by expanding the money supply. My children and my grandchildren are going to be the ones saddled by this debt of irresponsibility.”

Gould said he would like to see the money in the county’s contingency fund used to help ease the financial burdens of the taxpayers.

“What I plan to do is to move that that money be put towards the inflation that we are going to see in property taxation,” Gould said. “If things go as they are laid out in the budget that I voted against you are going to see a $2 million property tax increase. I would like to see part of that money offset that increase so it goes back to the people that feel the burden of that fiscal irresponsibility.”

Divvying up the funds

Patrick Ptak, communications director for Ducey’s office, said the Governor’s Office spoke with many local leaders across the state, including Kingman Mayor Joan Miles in Mohave County. He said the goal of the plan is to prioritize flexibility and minimize red tape.

“The governor made it very, very simple,” Sheehy said. “There are some requirements that the governor has from the federal government and we have to work through those parameters, but from our perspective the way the governor’s office set this up is with minimal red tape. It is seamless so far, and we look forward to having those funds in our accounts.”

In addition to making the money relatively easy for local governments to obtain, Ptak said the plan also allows those cities and counties flexibility to determine how to spend the influx of cash.

“We are making funding immediately available and up front,” Ptak said. “The way we do that is the funding we are providing directly to cities and counties will be used for the purposes of public health and public safety – things like law enforcement, emergency payroll, and stuff like that. We know that those are eligible costs under the federal requirements for these dollars. So what it does, is it allows local jurisdictions to free up whatever dollars they are putting towards those purposes to use as they see fit.”

Ptak also pointed out that Arizona has distributed the highest percentage of federal dollars to local governments of any state that it has been able to gather data from. In all, nearly $1.4 billion of the $2.8 billion earmarked for Arizona in CARES has gone to cities and counties – 49.82 percent of the total. A little less than $1 billion of those payments were to large population areas from the federal government with about $441,000 going to smaller governments through AZCARES.

Ptak said the CARES Act guidelines indicate that local governments should receive about 45 percent of the money with the other 55 percent going to each state. Arizona has split up the money nearly 50-50.

“We looked closely at how other states are doing it and the guidance from the federal government,” Ptak said. “We followed the same methodology in providing payments to cities and counties that did not receive a direct allocation as the U.S. Treasury.”

Ptak said the method used 2019 census data to divvy up the total amount of money, multiplied by 0.45 to account for the percentage meant for local governments. Ptak said the different per capita payment amounts stems from the fact that the U.S. Treasury used the states total $2.8 billion in relief funds to calculate the payments to the largest cities and counties while The State of Arizona used the $1.8 billion it was given to determine the shares for smaller cities.

State spending

Although Arizona has decided to distribute $441,000 to its small cities and counties, most of the rest of the money is still unspoken for.

The Governor’s Office has announced that it is setting aside $150 million for the Arizona Express Pay Program which will provide fast loans to entities such as local governments, tribes, nonprofits, school districts, fire districts and more who apply for relief funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Ptak said grants from FEMA can take months to arrive, so the program is designed to give the organization cash upfront to be paid back once the FEMA money is paid out.

That still leaves about $1.2 billion in CARES money that the state has available. Ptak said Arizona is keeping an eye on several potential trouble spots before it decides how the state will spend its share. He mentioned a projected $1 billion budget shortfall by the end of next fiscal year, social safety net programs that are being strained during the pandemic, Medicaid, and potential problems with the State Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund.

“We know that we only get to use them once, and we want to make sure that we are being wise in doing so,” Ptak said. “As we know more about the state’s budget picture, as more data comes in over the year and we know what the extent of some the economic fallout is we will be able to make more informed decisions about where those dollars should be used.”

0
2
1
0
2

We've made this article available without a subscription as a public service.

Now, more than ever, the world needs trustworthy reporting—but good journalism isn’t free. Please support us by subscribing or contributing today.

(9) comments

only in havasu

Gould and Johnson - never let it be said they spent a nickel more than the law demands them to do. Lake Havasu is and has always been given the middle finger by Mohave County. Just look at the box out on 95 that passes as a Sheriff’s Department. That building would have been condemned if it wasn’t a law-enforcement post. Years and years and years ago they kept prisoners there and a staff. I stopped there in 92 to report a drunk driver. Now, - it’s locked up and the cops sit outside and pray before entering to use the crapper. A citizen who didn’t even know it was a sheriff station donated the current generic sign because the original fell apart and blew away. Then there’s the Courthouse. The only public building in the State with 25 year old air conditioning and rat infested walls. Buster won’t even approve a can of bug spray. Meanwhile- the County grows like crazy and resources are non existent. Can someone please run for these offices to unthrone these two before they divert any more Havasu tax funds to Kingman?

HavasuGuy

What ever happened to the idea of Lake Havasu City becoming our own county?

dimlantern101

AGREE. Never understood why Lake Havasu pays the LION'S SHARE of tax revenue in Mohave County, yet, all the new county buildings are ALWAYS built in Kingman. I understand that Kingman is technically the "county seat," but a large part of the Mohave County population and taxpayers(Lake Havasu) can't even use the county resources! God forbid asking the city of Kingman to pay for anything because that would be sacrilege. Lake Havasu needs to extricate itself from Mohave County and let Kingman fend for itself or maybe we should vote in a provision that blocks the Board of Supervisors from diverting all our tax funds up there.

HavasuGuy

Why would we accept less tax money back for our community than what other Arizona citizens received? We pay the same amount of taxes as they do. Shouldn't we get the same amount back as they do?

Our governor spits in the face of every Arizona citizen when he treats us this way, where is our local representation when he does this? Are they really that worried about tRUMP's re-election or that scared of him that they don't stand up for us? Instead, they seem to be saying, it's okay - we should be thankful we got anything.

What about the 1.2 Billion that Ducey is holding on to? He likes to say that the representatives closest to the citizens should be the one's making decisions and he is supposedly against big government (the federal government) mandating how Arizona governs itself but, recently he took away local representatives aboility to deal with the pandemic in their communities and now he's dictating lower payments to Arizona cities and counties.

What has happened to the republican party??? Fiscally responsible my rearend...

tomgarven

[smile]

HavasuGuy

Cal Sheehy - You were elected to represent the tax payers (citizens) of Lake Havasu City not to be a boot licker to Ducey and the republican party. STEP UP!

tomgarven

I must be the only one who sees this as discriminatory behavior by our government. Providing more money [our tax dollars] to one community vs a different community just smell like discrimination to me. And some people wonder why our country seems so divided.

Congress is failing us [their approval rating is approx. 22% as of today] and we need to seriously pay attention to who we vote for come November. Study your ballot carefully and vote for who you believe might make the best House of Representatives or Senate member. Vote for the person you believe will do the best job for the country regardless of their political party affiliation.

And yes according to our national debt clock as of today we are $26+ TRILLION dollars in debt. We need people in Congress who are fiscal conservatives since we must get government spending under control or our whole economy could be in significant danger when people start demanding interest payments our government can't pay.

Debt Clock Link

https://www.usdebtclock.org/

Congress Approval Rating

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/congressional_job_approval-903.html

Objective Dialectic

Tomgarven [thumbup]

HavasuGuy

Tom - [thumbup][thumbup][thumbup]

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.