Self Driving Vehicle Fatality

Cars go by the scene Monday, March 19, 2018, near where a pedestrian was stuck by an Uber vehicle in autonomous mode late Sunday night in Tempe, Ariz. The vehicle was in autonomous mode with an operator behind the wheel when a woman walking outside of a crosswalk was hit. Uber suspended all of its self-driving testing Monday after what is believed to be the first fatal pedestrian crash involving the vehicles. (AP Photo/Chris Carlson)

Self-driving vehicles are back on Arizona roads, a little more than a year after an SUV struck and killed a woman in the Phoenix area. That accident in March of 2018 was an eye-opening one, and Uber, the company that had been testing the vehicles, quickly announced that it was pausing all of its self-driving operations around the country, including automated freight hauling on Interstate 40 between Topock and Sanders.

This week, another company announced it has been carrying mail in autonomous semi-trucks between Phoenix and Tucson since May, and with little fanfare. San Diego-based TuSimple says it is partnering with UPS in testing what is called “Level 4” autonomous technology, meaning that the truck’s on board computer is in control during the entire drive.

State law, thanks to Gov. Doug Ducey’s embrace of the technology’s economic potential, allows for the testing to go on. However, Arizona drivers ought to be very aware that there are driverless vehicles sharing the roadways with them. To be clear, TuSimple hasn’t done anything wrong, but it’s pretty obvious that the company didn’t do much until now to make its presence on our roadways known.

It’s concerning that these companies are allowed to use public roads and highways as a taxpayer-funded test track. Companies that want to test self-driving vehicles ought to use contained roadways, paid for with their own deep pockets. (TuSimple, by the way, is valued at $1.1 billion). Public highways and unwitting drivers should not be a cheap avenue for research and development.

Ducey’s 2015 executive order allowing for the testing of these vehicles also created a committee to advise state agencies on “how best to advance the testing operation of self-driving vehicles on public roads.” According to AZ Mirror, an independent online news publication, that committee met just once, in 2016, and never again. What a shame. Ducey wanted Arizona to be among the first to embrace self-driving technology because of the perceived economic benefits to the state. Early adopters of new technology, after all, are often well rewarded when the products reaches the mainstream. However, Arizona is shirking its responsibilities by not providing better guidance and oversight to the companies operating within our borders.

— Today’s News-Herald

0
0
0
0
0

(1) comment

tomgarven

Being sort of a techie guy I read this piece with interest. It is terribly unfortunate that someone lost their life in the accident in question. However, this accident was caused by HUMAN ERROR and not the failure of the self-driving computers. The individual paid to ride in the vehicle and respond to emergencies was NOT viewing the roadway at the time of the accident. Furthermore the computer that controlled that safety function was turned off. Here is a good link to what actually happened.

https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2018/05/29/why-ubers-self-driving-car-killed-a-pedestrian

While I am not currently in a position to buy a self driving car, I will when the prices come down to reasonable levels. It is my belief that myself and my passengers will be far safer.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.